Gyrokinetic analysis and simulation of pedestals to identify the culprits for energy losses using 'fingerprints'
M. Kotschenreuther(Fusion (United States)), A. Chankin(Max Planck Society), A. Diallo(Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory), E.R. Solano(Joint European Torus), Linjin Zheng(Japan External Trade Organization), F. Koechl(Culham Centre for Fusion Energy), S. Saarelma(United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority), D. R. Hatch(Fusion (United States)), R. J. Groebner(General Atomics (United States)), V. Parail(Culham Centre for Fusion Energy), C. Giroud(United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority), C. F. Maggi, J. C. Hillesheim(Culham Science Centre), S. M. Mahajan(Fusion (United States))
MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)
January 1, 2019
Cited by 36
Related Papers
Active Control of Type-I Edge-Localized Modes with<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:math>Perturbation Fields in the JET Tokamak
|Physical Review Letters|2007|595
A first-principles predictive model of the pedestal height and width: development, testing and ITER optimization with the EPED model
|Nuclear Fusion|2011|452
Island bootstrap current modification of the nonlinear dynamics of the tearing mode
|The Physics of Fluids|1986|349
Pedestal stability comparison and ITER pedestal prediction
|Nuclear Fusion|2009|231
Regime of very high confinement in the boronized DIII-D tokamak
|Physical Review Letters|1991|207