Systemic Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: ASCO Guideline

John D. Gordan(University of California, San Francisco), Erin B. Kennedy(American Society of Clinical Oncology), Ghassan K. Abou‐Alfa(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Muhammad Shaalan Beg(Southwestern Medical Center), Steven T. Brower, T. Gade(Penn Center for AIDS Research), Laura W. Goff(Vanderbilt University), Shilpi Gupta(Cornell University), Jennifer Guy(Sutter Health), William Proctor Harris, Renuka Iyer(Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center), Ishmael Jaiyesimi(Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak), Minaxi Jhawer(Englewood Hospital and Medical Center), Asha Karippot(Cancer Treatment Centers of America), Ahmed O. Kaseb(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Robin Kate Kelley(University of California, San Francisco), Jennifer J. Knox(Princess Margaret Cancer Centre), Jeremy Kortmansky(Yale Cancer Center), Andrea Leaf(VA NY Harbor Healthcare System), William Remak, Rachna T. Shroff(University of Arizona), Davendra Sohal(University of Cincinnati), Tamar H. Taddei(Yale University), Neeta K. Venepalli(University of Illinois Chicago), Andrea Wilson, Andrew X. Zhu(Harvard University), Michal G. Rose(Yale Cancer Center)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
November 16, 2020
Cited by 614

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline to assist in clinical decision making for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of published phase III randomized controlled trials (2007-2020) on systemic therapy for advanced HCC and provide recommended care options for this patient population. RESULTS: Nine phase III randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. RECOMMENDATIONS: Atezolizumab + bevacizumab (atezo + bev) may be offered as first-line treatment of most patients with advanced HCC, Child-Pugh class A liver disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 0-1, and following management of esophageal varices, when present, according to institutional guidelines. Where there are contraindications to atezolizumab and/or bevacizumab, tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib or lenvatinib may be offered as first-line treatment of patients with advanced HCC, Child-Pugh class A liver disease, and ECOG PS 0-1. Following first-line treatment with atezo + bev, and until better data are available, second-line therapy with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor may be recommended for appropriate candidates. Following first-line therapy with sorafenib or lenvatinib, second-line therapy options for appropriate candidates include cabozantinib, regorafenib for patients who previously tolerated sorafenib, or ramucirumab (for patients with α-fetoprotein ≥ 400 ng/mL), or atezo + bev where patients did not have access to this option as first-line therapy. Pembrolizumab or nivolumab are also reasonable options for appropriate patients following sorafenib or lenvatinib. Consideration of nivolumab + ipilimumab as an option for second-line therapy and third-line therapy is discussed. Further guidance on choosing between therapy options is included within the guideline. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis