Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers

Henning Bundgaard(Copenhagen University Hospital), Johan Skov Bundgaard(Copenhagen University Hospital), Daniel Emil Tadeusz Raaschou-Pedersen(Copenhagen University Hospital), Christian von Buchwald(Copenhagen University Hospital), Tobias Todsen(Copenhagen University Hospital), Jakob Norsk(Gentofte Hospital), Mia Marie Pries‐Heje(Copenhagen University Hospital), Christoffer Rasmus Vissing(Copenhagen University Hospital), Pernille Brok Nielsen(Gentofte Hospital), Ulrik Winsløw(Copenhagen University Hospital), Kamille Fogh(Gentofte Hospital), Rasmus Bo Hasselbalch(Gentofte Hospital), Jonas Henrik Kristensen(Gentofte Hospital), Anna Kirstine Ringgaard(Copenhagen University Hospital), Mikkel Porsborg Andersen(Aalborg University Hospital), Nicole Bakkegård Goecke(Technical University of Denmark), Ramona Trebbien(Statens Serum Institut), Kerstin Skovgaard(Technical University of Denmark), Thomas Benfield(Hvidovre Hospital), Henrik Ullum(Copenhagen University Hospital), Christian Torp‐Pedersen(Aalborg University Hospital), Kasper Iversen(Gentofte Hospital)
Annals of Internal Medicine
November 18, 2020
Cited by 404Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Observational evidence suggests that mask wearing mitigates transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). It is uncertain if this observed association arises through protection of uninfected wearers (protective effect), via reduced transmission from infected mask wearers (source control), or both. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether recommending surgical mask use outside the home reduces wearers' risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection in a setting where masks were uncommon and not among recommended public health measures. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial (DANMASK-19 [Danish Study to Assess Face Masks for the Protection Against COVID-19 Infection]). (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04337541). SETTING: Denmark, April and May 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Adults spending more than 3 hours per day outside the home without occupational mask use. INTERVENTION: Encouragement to follow social distancing measures for coronavirus disease 2019, plus either no mask recommendation or a recommendation to wear a mask when outside the home among other persons together with a supply of 50 surgical masks and instructions for proper use. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 infection in the mask wearer at 1 month by antibody testing, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), or hospital diagnosis. The secondary outcome was PCR positivity for other respiratory viruses. RESULTS: = 0.33). Multiple imputation accounting for loss to follow-up yielded similar results. Although the difference observed was not statistically significant, the 95% CIs are compatible with a 46% reduction to a 23% increase in infection. LIMITATION: Inconclusive results, missing data, variable adherence, patient-reported findings on home tests, no blinding, and no assessment of whether masks could decrease disease transmission from mask wearers to others. CONCLUSION: The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers by more than 50% in a community with modest infection rates, some degree of social distancing, and uncommon general mask use. The data were compatible with lesser degrees of self-protection. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: The Salling Foundations.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis