MuSe 2020 Challenge and Workshop

Lukas Stappen(University of Augsburg), Alice Baird(University of Augsburg), Georgios Rizos(Imperial College London), Panagiotis Tzirakis(Imperial College London), Xinchen Du(Technical University of Munich), Felix Hafner(University of Augsburg), Lea Schumann(University of Augsburg), Adria Mallol-Ragolta(University of Augsburg), Björn W. Schuller(Imperial College London), Iulia Lefter(Delft University of Technology), Erik Cambria(Nanyang Technological University), Ioannis Kompatsiaris(Centre for Research and Technology Hellas)
Unknown
October 15, 2020
Cited by 45

Abstract

Multimodal Sentiment Analysis in Real-life Media (MuSe) 2020 is a Challenge-based Workshop focusing on the tasks of sentiment recognition, as well as emotion-target engagement and trustworthiness detection by means of more comprehensively integrating the audio-visual and language modalities. The purpose of MuSe 2020 is to bring together communities from different disciplines; mainly, the audio-visual emotion recognition community (signal-based), and the sentiment analysis community (symbol-based). We present three distinct sub-challenges: MuSe-Wild, which focuses on continuous emotion (arousal and valence) prediction; MuSe-Topic, in which participants recognise 10 domain-specific topics as the target of 3-class (low, medium, high) emotions; and MuSe-Trust, in which the novel aspect of trustworthiness is to be predicted. In this paper, we provide detailed information on MuSe-CAR, the first of its kind in-the-wild database, which is utilised for the challenge, as well as the state-of-the-art features and modelling approaches applied. For each sub-challenge, a competitive baseline for participants is set; namely, on test we report for MuSe-Wild a combined (valence and arousal) CCC of .2568, for MuSe-Topic a score (computed as 0.34 * UAR + 0.66 * F1) of 76.78 % on the 10-class topic and 40.64 % on the 3-class emotion prediction, and for MuSe-Trust a CCC of .4359.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis