Randomized Controlled Trials Versus Real World Evidence: Neither Magic Nor Myth

Hans‐Georg Eichler(European Medicines Agency), Francesco Pignatti(European Medicines Agency), Brigitte Schwarzer‐Daum(Medical University of Vienna), Ana Hidalgo‐Simon(European Medicines Agency), Irmgard Eichler(European Medicines Agency), Peter Arlett(European Medicines Agency), A. J. B. Humphreys(European Medicines Agency), Spiros Vamvakas(European Medicines Agency), Nikolai C. Brun(Danish Medicines Agency), Guido Rasi(University of Rome Tor Vergata)
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
October 16, 2020
Cited by 196Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Compared with drugs from the blockbuster era, recently authorized drugs and those expected in the future present a heterogenous mix of chemicals, biologicals, and cell and gene therapies, a sizable fraction being for rare diseases, and even individualized treatments or individualized combinations. The shift in the nature of products entails secular trends for the definitions of "drugs" and "target population" and for clinical use and evidence generation. We discuss that the lessons learned from evidence generation for 20th century medicines may have limited relevance for 21st century medicines. We explain why the future is not about randomized controlled trials (RCTs) vs. real-world evidence (RWE) but RCTs and RWE-not just for the assessment of safety but also of effectiveness. Finally, we highlight that, in the era of precision medicine, we may not be able to reliably describe some small treatment effects-either by way of RCTs or RWE.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis