Ivosidenib or enasidenib combined with intensive chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed AML: a phase 1 study

Eytan M. Stein(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Courtney D. DiNardo(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Amir T. Fathi(Massachusetts General Hospital), Alice S. Mims(The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center), Keith W. Pratz(Johns Hopkins University), Michael R. Savona(Vanderbilt University), Anthony S. Stein(City of Hope), Richard M. Stone(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Eric S. Winer(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Christopher S. Seet(University of California, Los Angeles), Hartmut Döhner(University Hospital Ulm), Daniel A. Pollyea(University of Colorado Denver), James McCloskey(Hackensack University Medical Center), Olatoyosi Odenike(University of Chicago), Bob Löwenberg(Erasmus University Rotterdam), Gert J. Ossenkoppele, Prapti A. Patel(The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center), Mikhail Roshal(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Mark G. Frattini(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Frederik Lersch(Bristol-Myers Squibb (Switzerland)), Aleksandra Franovic(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Salah Nabhan(Agios Pharmaceuticals (United States)), Bin Fan(Agios Pharmaceuticals (United States)), Sung Choe(Agios Pharmaceuticals (United States)), Hongfang Wang(Agios Pharmaceuticals (United States)), Bin Wu(Agios Pharmaceuticals (United States)), Lei Hua(Agios Pharmaceuticals (United States)), Caroline Almon(Agios Pharmaceuticals (United States)), Michael K. Cooper(Agios Pharmaceuticals (United States)), Hagop M. Kantarjian(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Martin S. Tallman(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)
Blood
October 7, 2020
Cited by 232Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Ivosidenib (AG-120) and enasidenib (AG-221) are targeted oral inhibitors of the mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase (mIDH) 1 and 2 enzymes, respectively. Given their effectiveness as single agents in mIDH1/2 relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), this phase 1 study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ivosidenib or enasidenib combined with intensive chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed mIDH1/2 AML. Ivosidenib 500 mg once daily and enasidenib 100 mg once daily were well tolerated in this setting, with safety profiles generally consistent with those of induction and consolidation chemotherapy alone. The frequency of IDH differentiation syndrome was low, as expected given the concurrent administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy. In patients receiving ivosidenib, the frequency and grades of QT interval prolongation were similar to those observed with ivosidenib monotherapy. Increases in total bilirubin were more frequently observed in patients treated with enasidenib, consistent with this inhibitor's known potential to inhibit UGT1A1, but did not appear to have significant clinical consequences. In patients receiving ivosidenib (n = 60) or enasidenib (n = 91), end-of-induction complete remission (CR) rates were 55% and 47%, respectively, and CR/CR with incomplete neutrophil or platelet recovery (CR/CRi/CRp) rates were 72% and 63%, respectively. In patients with a best overall response of CR/CRi/CRp, 16/41 (39%) receiving ivosidenib had IDH1 mutation clearance and 15/64 (23%) receiving enasidenib had IDH2 mutation clearance by digital polymerase chain reaction; furthermore, 16/20 (80%) and 10/16 (63%), respectively, became negative for measurable residual disease by multiparameter flow cytometry. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02632708.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis