Stellarator-tokamak energy confinement comparison based on ASDEX Upgrade and Wendelstein 7-X hydrogen plasmas
U. Stroth(Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics), D. Zhang(Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics - Greifswald), P. A. Schneider(Max Planck Society), K. J. Brunner(Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics - Greifswald), K. Rahbarnia(Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics - Greifswald), G. Birkenmeier(Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics), E.R. Scott(Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics - Greifswald), J. Knauer(Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics - Greifswald), G. Fuchert(Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics - Greifswald), O. Kardaun(Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics), P. Hacker(Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics - Greifswald), Florian Günzkofer(Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR)), M. Beurskens(Japan Atomic Energy Agency)
Cited by 15
Related Papers
Active Control of Type-I Edge-Localized Modes with<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:math>Perturbation Fields in the JET Tokamak
|Physical Review Letters|2007|595
A first-principles predictive model of the pedestal height and width: development, testing and ITER optimization with the EPED model
|Nuclear Fusion|2011|452
JET ITER-like wall—overview and experimental programme
|Physica Scripta|2011|346
Overview of first Wendelstein 7-X high-performance operation
|Nuclear Fusion|2019|248
Pedestal stability comparison and ITER pedestal prediction
|Nuclear Fusion|2009|231