Venetoclax Plus Rituximab in Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: 4-Year Results and Evaluation of Impact of Genomic Complexity and Gene Mutations From the MURANO Phase III Study

Arnon P. Kater(Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam), Jenny Wu, Thomas J. Kipps(University of California San Diego), Barbara Eichhorst(University of Cologne), Peter Hillmen(St James's University Hospital), James D’Rozario(Australian National University), Sarit Assouline(Jewish General Hospital), Carolyn Owen(University of Calgary), Tadeusz Robak(Copernicus Memorial Hospital), Javier de la Serna(Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre), Ulrich Jaeger(Medical University of Vienna), Guillaume Cartron(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier), Marco Montillo(Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda), Julie Dubois(Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam), Eric Eldering(Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam), Clemens Mellink(Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam), Anne-Marie Van Der Kevie-Kersemaekers(Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam), Su Young Kim(AbbVie (United States)), Brenda Chyla(AbbVie (United States)), Elizabeth A. Punnoose, Christopher R. Bolen, Zoe J. Assaf, Yanwen Jiang, Jue Wang, Marcus Lefebure(Roche (United Kingdom)), Michelle Boyer(Roche (United Kingdom)), Kathryn Humphrey(Roche (United Kingdom)), John F. Seymour(The Royal Melbourne Hospital)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
September 28, 2020
Cited by 218Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE In previous analyses of the MURANO study, fixed-duration venetoclax plus rituximab (VenR) resulted in improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). At the 4-year follow-up, we report long-term outcomes, response to subsequent therapies, and the predictive value of molecular and genetic characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with CLL were randomly assigned to 2 years of venetoclax (VenR for the first six cycles) or six cycles of BR. PFS, overall survival (OS), peripheral-blood minimal residual disease (MRD) status, genomic complexity (GC), and gene mutations were assessed. RESULTS Of 389 patients, 194 were assigned to VenR and 195 to BR. Four-year PFS and OS rates were higher with VenR than BR, at 57.3% and 4.6% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.19; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.25), and 85.3% and 66.8% (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.65), respectively. Undetectable MRD (uMRD) at end of combination therapy (EOCT) was associated with superior PFS compared with low MRD positivity (HR, 0.50) and high MRD positivity (HR, 0.15). Patients in the VenR arm who received ibrutinib as their first therapy after progression (n = 12) had a reported response rate of 100% (10 of 10 evaluable patients); patients subsequently treated with a venetoclax-based regimen (n = 14) had a reported response rate of 55% (six of 11 evaluable patients). With VenR, the uMRD rate at end of treatment (EOT) was lower in patients with GC than in those without GC ( P = .042); higher GC was associated with shorter PFS. Higher MRD positivity rates were seen with BIRC3 and BRAF mutations at EOCT and with TP53, NOTCH1, XPO1, and BRAF mutations at EOT. CONCLUSION Efficacy benefits with fixed-duration VenR are sustained and particularly durable in patients who achieve uMRD. Salvage therapy with ibrutinib after VenR achieved high response rates. Genetic mutations and GC affected MRD rates and PFS.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis