Survival with Olaparib in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Maha Hussain(Hebron University), Joaquı́n Mateo(Hebron University), Karim Fizazi(Hebron University), Fred Saad(Hebron University), Neal D. Shore(Hebron University), Shahneen Sandhu(Hebron University), Kim N.(Hebron University), Oliver Sartor(AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)), Neeraj Agarwal(Hebron University), David Olmos(Hebron University), Antoine Thiery-Vuillemin(Hebron University), Przemyslaw Twardowski(Hebron University), Guilhem Roubaud(Hebron University), Mustafa Özgüroğlu(Hebron University), Jinyu Kang(Hebron University), Joseph E. Burgents(Hebron University), Christopher Gresty(Hebron University), Claire Corcoran(Hebron University), Carrie A. Adelman(AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)), Johann S. de Bono(Hebron University)
New England Journal of Medicine
September 20, 2020
Cited by 760Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We previously reported that olaparib led to significantly longer imaging-based progression-free survival than the physician's choice of enzalutamide or abiraterone among men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had qualifying alterations in homologous recombination repair genes and whose disease had progressed during previous treatment with a next-generation hormonal agent. The results of the final analysis of overall survival have not yet been reported. METHODS: , and cohort B included 142 patients with at least one alteration in any of the other 12 prespecified genes. Crossover to olaparib was allowed after imaging-based disease progression for patients who met certain criteria. Overall survival in cohort A, a key secondary end point, was analyzed with the use of an alpha-controlled, stratified log-rank test at a data maturity of approximately 60%. The primary and other key secondary end points were reported previously. RESULTS: The median duration of overall survival in cohort A was 19.1 months with olaparib and 14.7 months with control therapy (hazard ratio for death, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50 to 0.97; P = 0.02). In cohort B, the median duration of overall survival was 14.1 months with olaparib and 11.5 months with control therapy. In the overall population (cohorts A and B), the corresponding durations were 17.3 months and 14.0 months. Overall, 86 of 131 patients (66%) in the control group crossed over to receive olaparib (56 of 83 patients [67%] in cohort A). A sensitivity analysis that adjusted for crossover to olaparib showed hazard ratios for death of 0.42 (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.91) in cohort A, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.11 to 5.98) in cohort B, and 0.55 (95% CI, 0.29 to 1.06) in the overall population. CONCLUSIONS: and whose disease had progressed during previous treatment with a next-generation hormonal agent, those who were initially assigned to receive olaparib had a significantly longer duration of overall survival than those who were assigned to receive enzalutamide or abiraterone plus prednisone as the control therapy, despite substantial crossover from control therapy to olaparib. (Funded by AstraZeneca and Merck Sharp and Dohme; PROfound ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02987543.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis