Should Percutaneous Coronary Intervention be the Standard Treatment Strategy for Significant Coronary Artery Disease in all Octogenarians?
George Kassimis(Aristotle University of Thessaloniki), Antonios Ziakas(Leiden University Medical Center), Matthaios Didagelos(Aristotle University of Thessaloniki), Joanna Abramik(Cheltenham General Hospital), Nestoras Kontogiannis(Cheltenham General Hospital), Tushar Raina(Cheltenham General Hospital), Dimitrios Petroglou(Aristotle University of Thessaloniki), Grigoris V. Karamasis(National and Kapodistrian University of Athens), Leonidas Poulimenos(Hippocration General Hospital), Athanasios Katsikis(Université Paris Cité), Vassilios Vassilikos(Aristotle University of Thessaloniki), Christodoulos Papadopoulos(Aristotle University of Thessaloniki), Ioannis Kanonidis(Aristotle University of Thessaloniki)
Cited by 5
Related Papers
Hypothermia versus Normothermia after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
|New England Journal of Medicine|2021|979
Anatomical variations in the branches of the human aortic arch in 633 angiographies: clinical significance and literature review
|Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy|2008|243
Distal Versus Traditional Radial Approach for Coronary Angiography
|Cardiovascular revascularization medicine|2018|177
Post-stenting fractional flow reserve vs coronary angiography for optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (TARGET-FFR)
|European Heart Journal|2021|151
The aberrant right subclavian artery: cadaveric study and literature review
|Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy|2016|101