Phase 1–2 Trial of a SARS-CoV-2 Recombinant Spike Protein Nanoparticle Vaccine

Cheryl Keech(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Gary Albert(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Iksung Cho(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Andreana Robertson(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Patricia Reed(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Susan Neal(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Joyce S. Plested(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Mingzhu Zhu(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Shane Cloney-Clark(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Haixia Zhou(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Gale Smith(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Nita Patel(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Matthew B. Frieman(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Robert Haupt(University of Maryland, Baltimore), James Logue(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Marisa E. McGrath(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Stuart Weston(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Pedro A. Piedra(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Chinar Desai(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Kathleen Callahan(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Maggie Lewis(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Patricia Price-Abbott(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Neil Formica(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Vivek Shinde(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Louis Fries(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Jason D. Lickliter(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Paul Griffin(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Bethanie Wilkinson(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Gregory M. Glenn(University of Maryland, Baltimore)
New England Journal of Medicine
September 2, 2020
Cited by 1,244Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: NVX-CoV2373 is a recombinant severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (rSARS-CoV-2) nanoparticle vaccine composed of trimeric full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoproteins and Matrix-M1 adjuvant. METHODS: We initiated a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 1-2 trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the rSARS-CoV-2 vaccine (in 5-μg and 25-μg doses, with or without Matrix-M1 adjuvant, and with observers unaware of trial-group assignments) in 131 healthy adults. In phase 1, vaccination comprised two intramuscular injections, 21 days apart. The primary outcomes were reactogenicity; laboratory values (serum chemistry and hematology), according to Food and Drug Administration toxicity scoring, to assess safety; and IgG anti-spike protein response (in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] units). Secondary outcomes included unsolicited adverse events, wild-type virus neutralization (microneutralization assay), and T-cell responses (cytokine staining). IgG and microneutralization assay results were compared with 32 (IgG) and 29 (neutralization) convalescent serum samples from patients with Covid-19, most of whom were symptomatic. We performed a primary analysis at day 35. RESULTS: After randomization, 83 participants were assigned to receive the vaccine with adjuvant and 25 without adjuvant, and 23 participants were assigned to receive placebo. No serious adverse events were noted. Reactogenicity was absent or mild in the majority of participants, more common with adjuvant, and of short duration (mean, ≤2 days). One participant had mild fever that lasted 1 day. Unsolicited adverse events were mild in most participants; there were no severe adverse events. The addition of adjuvant resulted in enhanced immune responses, was antigen dose-sparing, and induced a T helper 1 (Th1) response. The two-dose 5-μg adjuvanted regimen induced geometric mean anti-spike IgG (63,160 ELISA units) and neutralization (3906) responses that exceeded geometric mean responses in convalescent serum from mostly symptomatic Covid-19 patients (8344 and 983, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: At 35 days, NVX-CoV2373 appeared to be safe, and it elicited immune responses that exceeded levels in Covid-19 convalescent serum. The Matrix-M1 adjuvant induced CD4+ T-cell responses that were biased toward a Th1 phenotype. (Funded by the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368988).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis