Impact on mental health care and on mental health service users of the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods survey of UK mental health care staff

Sonia Johnson(Mental Health Research UK), Christian Dalton‐Locke(Mental Health Research UK), Norha Vera San Juan(King's College London), Una Foye(King's College London), Siân Oram(King's College London), Alexandra Papamichail(King's College London), Sabine Landau(King's College London), Rachel Rowan Olive(Mental Health Research UK), Tamar Jeynes(Mental Health Research UK), Prisha Shah(Mental Health Research UK), Luke Sheridan Rains(Mental Health Research UK), Brynmor Lloyd‐Evans(Mental Health Research UK), Sarah Carr(University of Birmingham), Helen Killaspy(Mental Health Research UK), Steve Gillard(St George's, University of London), Alan Simpson(King's College London), Andy Bell, Francesca Bentivegna, Joseph Botham, Julian Edbrooke‐Childs, Lucy Goldsmith, Lisa Marie Grünwald, Jasmine Harju‐Seppänen, Stephani L. Hatch, Claire Henderson, Louise M. Howard, Rebecca Lane, Sarah Ledden(University of Birmingham), Monica Leverton, Jo Lomani(Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust), Natasha Lyons, Paul McCrone, Chukwuma Ntephe, Josephine Ocloo, David Osborn, Steve Pilling(St George's, University of London), Konstantina Poursanidou, Hannah Scott, Thomas Steare, Ruth Stuart, André Tomlin, Kati Turner, Vasiliki Tzouvara
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
August 28, 2020
Cited by 244Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has potential to disrupt and burden the mental health care system, and to magnify inequalities experienced by mental health service users. METHODS: We investigated staff reports regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in its early weeks on mental health care and mental health service users in the UK using a mixed methods online survey. Recruitment channels included professional associations and networks, charities, and social media. Quantitative findings were reported with descriptive statistics, and content analysis conducted for qualitative data. RESULTS: 2,180 staff from a range of sectors, professions, and specialties participated. Immediate infection control concerns were highly salient for inpatient staff, new ways of working for community staff. Multiple rapid adaptations and innovations in response to the crisis were described, especially remote working. This was cautiously welcomed but found successful in only some clinical situations. Staff had specific concerns about many groups of service users, including people whose conditions are exacerbated by pandemic anxieties and social disruptions; people experiencing loneliness, domestic abuse and family conflict; those unable to understand and follow social distancing requirements; and those who cannot engage with remote care. CONCLUSION: This overview of staff concerns and experiences in the early COVID-19 pandemic suggests directions for further research and service development: we suggest that how to combine infection control and a therapeutic environment in hospital, and how to achieve effective and targeted tele-health implementation in the community, should be priorities. The limitations of our convenience sample must be noted.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis