Therapeutic vulnerabilities in the DNA damage response for the treatment of ATRX mutant neuroblastoma

Sally L. George(Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust), Federica Lorenzi(Institute of Cancer Research), David S. King(Molecular Oncology (United States)), Sabine Hartlieb(German Cancer Research Center), James Campbell(Institute of Cancer Research), Helen Pemberton(Institute of Cancer Research), Umut H. Toprak(German Cancer Research Center), Karen Barker(Institute of Cancer Research), Jennifer Tall(Institute of Cancer Research), Barbara Martins Da Costa(Institute of Cancer Research), Marlinde L. van den Boogaard(Princess Máxima Center), M. Emmy M. Dolman(Princess Máxima Center), Jan J. Molenaar(Princess Máxima Center), Helen E. Bryant(Molecular Oncology (United States)), Frank Westermann(German Cancer Research Center), Christopher J. Lord(Institute of Cancer Research), Louis Chesler(Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust)
EBioMedicine
August 22, 2020
Cited by 79Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In neuroblastoma, genetic alterations in ATRX, define a distinct poor outcome patient subgroup. Despite the need for new therapies, there is a lack of available models and a dearth of pre-clinical research. METHODS: To evaluate the impact of ATRX loss of function (LoF) in neuroblastoma, we utilized CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing to generate neuroblastoma cell lines isogenic for ATRX. We used these and other models to identify therapeutically exploitable synthetic lethal vulnerabilities associated with ATRX LoF. FINDINGS: In isogenic cell lines, we found that ATRX inactivation results in increased DNA damage, homologous recombination repair (HRR) defects and impaired replication fork processivity. In keeping with this, high-throughput compound screening showed selective sensitivity in ATRX mutant cells to multiple PARP inhibitors and the ATM inhibitor KU60019. ATRX mutant cells also showed selective sensitivity to the DNA damaging agents, sapacitabine and irinotecan. HRR deficiency was also seen in the ATRX deleted CHLA-90 cell line, and significant sensitivity demonstrated to olaparib/irinotecan combination therapy in all ATRX LoF models. In-vivo sensitivity to olaparib/irinotecan was seen in ATRX mutant but not wild-type xenografts. Finally, sustained responses to olaparib/irinotecan therapy were seen in an ATRX deleted neuroblastoma patient derived xenograft. INTERPRETATION: ATRX LoF results in specific DNA damage repair defects that can be therapeutically exploited. In ATRX LoF models, preclinical sensitivity is demonstrated to olaparib and irinotecan, a combination that can be rapidly translated into the clinic. FUNDING: This work was supported by Christopher's Smile, Neuroblastoma UK, Cancer Research UK, and the Royal Marsden Hospital NIHR BRC.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis