Rucaparib in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Harboring a<i>BRCA1</i>or<i>BRCA2</i>Gene Alteration

Wassim Abida(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Akash Patnaik(University of Chicago), David Campbell(Barwon Health), Jeremy Shapiro(Cabrini Hospital), Alan H. Bryce(Mayo Clinic Hospital), Ray McDermott(Tallaght University Hospital), Brieuc Sautois(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège), Nicholas J. Vogelzang(Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada), Richard Bambury(Cork University Hospital), Éric Voog(Centre Jean Bernard), Jingsong Zhang(Moffitt Cancer Center), Josep M. Piulats(Institut Català d'Oncologia), Charles J. Ryan(University of Minnesota), Axel S. Merseburger(University of Lübeck), Gedske Daugaard(Copenhagen University Hospital), Axel Heidenreich(University Hospital Cologne), Karim Fizazi(Université Paris-Saclay), Celestia S. Higano(University of Washington), Laurence E. Krieger(Northern Cancer Institute), Cora N. Sternberg(Cornell University), Simon P. Watkins, Darrin Despain(Clovis Oncology (United States)), Andrew D. Simmons(Clovis Oncology (United States)), Andrea Loehr(Clovis Oncology (United States)), Melanie Dowson(Clovis Oncology (United Kingdom)), Tony Golsorkhi(Clovis Oncology (United States)), Simon Chowdhury(Guy's Hospital), on behalf of the TRITON2 investigators
Journal of Clinical Oncology
August 14, 2020
Cited by 674Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE BRCA1 or BRCA2 ( BRCA) alterations are common in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and may confer sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. We present results from patients with mCRPC associated with a BRCA alteration treated with rucaparib 600 mg twice daily in the phase II TRITON2 study. METHODS We enrolled patients who progressed after one to two lines of next-generation androgen receptor–directed therapy and one taxane-based chemotherapy for mCRPC. Efficacy and safety populations included patients with a deleterious BRCA alteration who received ≥ 1 dose of rucaparib. Key efficacy end points were objective response rate (ORR; per RECIST/Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 in patients with measurable disease as assessed by blinded, independent radiology review and by investigators) and locally assessed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (≥ 50% decrease from baseline) rate. RESULTS Efficacy and safety populations included 115 patients with a BRCA alteration with or without measurable disease. Confirmed ORRs per independent radiology review and investigator assessment were 43.5% (95% CI, 31.0% to 56.7%; 27 of 62 patients) and 50.8% (95% CI, 38.1% to 63.4%; 33 of 65 patients), respectively. The confirmed PSA response rate was 54.8% (95% CI, 45.2% to 64.1%; 63 of 115 patients). ORRs were similar for patients with a germline or somatic BRCA alteration and for patients with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 alteration, while a higher PSA response rate was observed in patients with a BRCA2 alteration. The most frequent grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse event was anemia (25.2%; 29 of 115 patients). CONCLUSION Rucaparib has antitumor activity in patients with mCRPC and a deleterious BRCA alteration, but with a manageable safety profile consistent with that reported in other solid tumor types.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis