4D flow CMR analysis comparing patients with anatomically shaped aortic sinus prostheses, tube prostheses and healthy subjects introducing the wall shear stress gradient: a case control study
Malte Maria Sieren(Universitäres Kinderwunschzentrum Lübeck), Thekla Oechtering(University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein), Victoria Schultz, Alex Frydrychowicz(University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein), Jörg Barkhausen(University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein), Franz Wegner(University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein), Hans‐Hinrich Sievers(ScienceScope (United Kingdom)), Michael Scharfschwerdt(University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein), Markus Huellebrand(Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine), Buntaro Fujita(Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia)
Cited by 13
Related Papers
Outcomes in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis
|Journal of the American College of Cardiology|2017|486
Time‐resolved 3D MR velocity mapping at 3T: Improved navigator‐gated assessment of vascular anatomy and blood flow
|Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging|2007|379
Outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement for degenerated bioprostheses, failed annuloplasty rings, and mitral annular calcification
|European Heart Journal|2018|377
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Pure Native Aortic Valve Regurgitation
|Journal of the American College of Cardiology|2017|331
Evaluation of 3D blood flow patterns and wall shear stress in the normal and dilated thoracic aorta using flow-sensitive 4D CMR
|Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance|2012|233