Molecular subtyping and genomic profiling expand precision medicine in refractory metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: the FUTURE trial

Yi-Zhou Jiang(Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University), Yin Liu(Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University), Yi Xiao(Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University), Xin Hu(Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University), Lin Jiang(Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University), Wen-Jia Zuo(Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University), Ding Ma(Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University), Jia-Han Ding(Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University), Xiaoyu Zhu(Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine (China)), Jianjun Zou(Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine (China)), Claire F. Verschraegen(The Ohio State University), Daniel G. Stover(The Ohio State University), Virginia Kaklamani(The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center), Zhong-Hua Wang(Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University), Zhi‐Ming Shao(Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University)
Cell Research
July 27, 2020
Cited by 311Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous disease, and molecular subtyping may result in improved diagnostic precision and targeted therapies. Our previous study classified TNBCs into four subtypes with putative therapeutic targets. Here, we conducted the FUTURE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03805399), a phase Ib/II subtyping-based and genomic biomarker-guided umbrella trial, to evaluate the efficacy of these targets. Patients with refractory metastatic TNBC were enrolled and stratified by TNBC subtypes and genomic biomarkers, and assigned to one of these seven arms: (A) pyrotinib with capecitabine, (B) androgen receptor inhibitor with CDK4/6 inhibitor, (C) anti PD-1 with nab-paclitaxel, (D) PARP inhibitor included, (E) and (F) anti-VEGFR included, or (G) mTOR inhibitor with nab-paclitaxel. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). We enrolled 69 refractory metastatic TNBC patients with a median of three previous lines of therapy (range, 1-8). Objective response was achieved in 20 (29.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 18.7%-41.2%) of the 69 intention-to-treat (ITT) patients. Our results showed that immunotherapy (arm C), in particular, achieved the highest ORR (52.6%, 95% CI: 28.9%-75.6%) in the ITT population. Arm E demonstrated favorable ORR (26.1%, 95% CI: 10.2%-48.4% in the ITT population) but with more high grade (≥ 3) adverse events. Somatic mutations of TOP2A and CD8 immunohistochemical score may have the potential to predict immunotherapy response in the immunomodulatory subtype of TNBC. In conclusion, the phase Ib/II FUTURE trial suggested a new concept for TNBC treatment, demonstrating the clinical benefit of subtyping-based targeted therapy for refractory metastatic TNBC.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis