Follicular lymphoma in the modern era: survival, treatment outcomes, and identification of high-risk subgroups

Connie Lee Batlevi(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Fushen Sha(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Anna Alperovich(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Ai Ni(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Katy Smith(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Zhitao Ying(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Jacob D. Soumerai(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Philip Caron(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Lorenzo Falchi(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Audrey Hamilton(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Paul A. Hamlin(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Steven M. Horwitz(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Erel Joffe(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Anita Kumar(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Matthew J. Matasar(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Alison J. Moskowitz(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Craig H. Moskowitz(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Ariela Noy(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Colette Owens(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Lia Palomba(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), David J. Straus(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Gottfried von Keudell(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Andrew D. Zelenetz(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Venkatraman Seshan(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Anas Younes(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)
Blood Cancer Journal
July 17, 2020
Cited by 199Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) frequently require multiple treatments during their disease course; however, survival based on lines of treatment remains poorly described in the post-rituximab era. Also, the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score was developed to predict survival at diagnosis, yet it remains unknown whether increase in FLIPI score following an initial observation period is associated with less-favorable outcomes. To address these knowledge gaps, we retrospectively studied 1088 patients with FL grade 1-3A managed between 1998 and 2009 at our institution. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after first-line treatment were not reached and 4.73 years, respectively. Following successive lines of treatment, years of median OS and PFS were, respectively: after second-line, 11.7 and 1.5; third-line, 8.8 and 1.1; fourth-line, 5.3 and 0.9; fifth-line, 3.1 and 0.6; sixth-line, 1.9 and 0.5. In initially observed, subsequently treated patients, FLIPI score increase after observation was associated with inferior survival following first-line treatment. The reduced survival we observed after second-line and later therapy supports the development of new treatments for relapsed patients and benchmarks historical targets for clinical endpoints. This study also highlights the utility of changes in FLIPI score at diagnosis and after observation in identifying patients likely to have worse outcomes.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis