Tocilizumab for Treatment of Mechanically Ventilated Patients With COVID-19

Emily C. Somers(University of Michigan), Gregory Eschenauer(University of Michigan), Jonathan P. Troost(University of Michigan), Jonathan L. Golob(University of Michigan), Tejal Gandhi(University of Michigan), Lu Wang(University of Michigan), Nina Zhou(University of Michigan), Lindsay A Petty(University of Michigan), Ji Hoon Baang(University of Michigan), Nicholas O. Dillman(Michigan Medicine), David Frame(University of Michigan), Kevin Gregg(University of Michigan), Daniel Kaul(University of Michigan), Jerod Nagel(Michigan Medicine), Twisha S Patel(Michigan Medicine), Shiwei Zhou(University of Michigan), Adam S. Lauring(University of Michigan), David A. Hanauer(University of Michigan), Emily T. Martin(University of Michigan), Pratima Sharma(University of Michigan), Christopher Fung(University of Michigan), Jason M. Pogue(University of Michigan)
Clinical Infectious Diseases
July 9, 2020
Cited by 499Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can manifest in rapid decompensation and respiratory failure with elevated inflammatory markers, consistent with cytokine release syndrome for which IL-6 blockade is an approved treatment. METHODS: We assessed effectiveness and safety of IL-6 blockade with tocilizumab in a single-center cohort of patients with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation. The primary endpoint was survival probability postintubation; secondary analyses included an ordinal illness severity scale integrating superinfections. Outcomes in patients who received tocilizumab compared with tocilizumab-untreated controls were evaluated using multivariable Cox regression with propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). RESULTS: 154 patients were included, of whom 78 received tocilizumab and 76 did not. Median follow-up was 47 days (range, 28-67). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, although tocilizumab-treated patients were younger (mean: 55 vs 60 years), less likely to have chronic pulmonary disease (10% vs 28%), and had lower D-dimer values at time of intubation (median: 2.4 vs 6.5 mg/dL). In IPTW-adjusted models, tocilizumab was associated with a 45% reduction in hazard of death (HR, .55; 95% CI, .33-.90) and improved status on the ordinal outcome scale [OR per 1-level increase, .58; .36-.94). Although tocilizumab was associated with an increased proportion of patients with superinfections (54% vs 26%; P < .001), there was no difference in 28-day case fatality rate among tocilizumab-treated patients with versus without superinfection (22% vs 15%; P = .42). Staphylococcus aureus accounted for ~50% of bacterial pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients, tocilizumab was associated with lower mortality despite higher superinfection occurrence.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis