Conversion of Urine Protein–Creatinine Ratio or Urine Dipstick Protein to Urine Albumin–Creatinine Ratio for Use in Chronic Kidney Disease Screening and Prognosis

Keiichi Sumida(University of Tennessee Health Science Center), Girish N. Nadkarni(Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai), Morgan E. Grams(Johns Hopkins University), Yingying Sang(Johns Hopkins University), Shoshana H. Ballew(Johns Hopkins University), Josef Coresh(Johns Hopkins University), Kunihiro Matsushita(Johns Hopkins University), Aditya Surapaneni(Johns Hopkins University), Nigel J. Brunskill(University of Leicester), Steven J. Chadban(The University of Sydney), Alex R. Chang(Geisinger Health System), Massimo Círillo(University of Naples Federico II), Kenn B. Daratha(Gonzaga University), Ron T. Gansevoort(University Medical Center Groningen), Amit X. Garg(Western University), Licia Iacoviello(University of Insubria), Takamasa Kayama(Yamagata University), Tsuneo Konta(Yamagata University), Csaba P. Kövesdy(University of Tennessee Health Science Center), James Lash(University of Illinois Chicago), Brian J. Lee(Kaiser Permanente Moanalua Medical Center), Rupert Major(University of Leicester), Marie Metzger(Université Paris-Sud), Katsuyuki Miura(Shiga University of Medical Science), David Naimark(University of Toronto), Robert G. Nelson(National Institutes of Health), Simon Sawhney(University of Aberdeen), Nikita Stempniewicz(American Medical Group Association), Mila Tang(University of British Columbia), Raymond R. Townsend(University of Pennsylvania), Jamie P. Traynor(Queen Elizabeth University Hospital), José Manuel Valdivielso, Jack F.M. Wetzels(Radboud University Nijmegen), Kevan R. Polkinghorne(Monash University), Hiddo J.L. Heerspink(University Medical Center Groningen)
Annals of Internal Medicine
July 13, 2020
Cited by 328Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although measuring albuminuria is the preferred method for defining and staging chronic kidney disease (CKD), total urine protein or dipstick protein is often measured instead. OBJECTIVE: To develop equations for converting urine protein-creatinine ratio (PCR) and dipstick protein to urine albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) and to test their diagnostic accuracy in CKD screening and staging. DESIGN: Individual participant-based meta-analysis. SETTING: 12 research and 21 clinical cohorts. PARTICIPANTS: 919 383 adults with same-day measures of ACR and PCR or dipstick protein. MEASUREMENTS: Equations to convert urine PCR and dipstick protein to ACR were developed and tested for purposes of CKD screening (ACR ≥30 mg/g) and staging (stage A2: ACR of 30 to 299 mg/g; stage A3: ACR ≥300 mg/g). RESULTS: Median ACR was 14 mg/g (25th to 75th percentile of cohorts, 5 to 25 mg/g). The association between PCR and ACR was inconsistent for PCR values less than 50 mg/g. For higher PCR values, the PCR conversion equations demonstrated moderate sensitivity (91%, 75%, and 87%) and specificity (87%, 89%, and 98%) for screening (ACR >30 mg/g) and classification into stages A2 and A3, respectively. Urine dipstick categories of trace or greater, trace to +, and ++ for screening for ACR values greater than 30 mg/g and classification into stages A2 and A3, respectively, had moderate sensitivity (62%, 36%, and 78%) and high specificity (88%, 88%, and 98%). For individual risk prediction, the estimated 2-year 4-variable kidney failure risk equation using predicted ACR from PCR had discrimination similar to that of using observed ACR. LIMITATION: Diverse methods of ACR and PCR quantification were used; measurements were not always performed in the same urine sample. CONCLUSION: Urine ACR is the preferred measure of albuminuria; however, if ACR is not available, predicted ACR from PCR or urine dipstick protein may help in CKD screening, staging, and prognosis. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and National Kidney Foundation.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis