Genetic diversity targets and indicators in the CBD post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework must be improved

Sean Hoban(Morton Arboretum), Michael W. Bruford(Cardiff University), Josephine D’Urban Jackson(Cardiff University), Margarida Lopes-Fernandes(Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas), Myriam Heuertz(CEA CESTA), Paul A. Hohenlohe(University of Idaho), Ivan Paz‐Vinas(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Per Sjögren‐Gulve(Swedish Environmental Protection Agency), Gernot Segelbacher(University of Freiburg), Cristiano Vernesi(Fondazione Edmund Mach), Sally N. Aitken(University of British Columbia), Laura D. Bertola(City College of New York), Paulette Bloomer(University of Pretoria), Martin F. Breed(Flinders University), Hernando Rodríguez‐Correa(Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México), W. Chris Funk(Colorado State University), Catherine E. Grueber(The University of Sydney), Margaret E. Hunter(United States Geological Survey), Rodolfo Jaffé(Universidade de São Paulo), Libby Liggins(Massey University), Joachim Mergeay(Research Institute for Nature and Forest), Farideh Moharrek(Natural History Museum), David O’Brien(Scottish Natural Heritage), Rob Ogden(Edinburgh College), Clarisse Palma‐Silva(Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)), Jennifer C. Pierson, Uma Ramakrishnan(National Centre for Biological Sciences), Murielle Simo‐Droissart(Université de Yaoundé I), Naoki Tani(Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences), Lisette P. Waits(University of Idaho), Linda Laikre(Stockholm University)
Biological Conservation
July 1, 2020
Cited by 593Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

The 196 parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) will soon agree to a post-2020 global framework for conserving the three elements of biodiversity (genetic, species, and ecosystem diversity) while ensuring sustainable development and benefit sharing. As the most significant global conservation policy mechanism, the new CBD framework has far-reaching consequences- it will guide conservation actions and reporting for each member country until 2050. In previous CBD strategies, as well as other major conservation policy mechanisms, targets and indicators for genetic diversity (variation at the DNA level within species, which facilitates species adaptation and ecosystem function) were undeveloped and focused on species of agricultural relevance. We assert that, to meet global conservation goals, genetic diversity within all species, not just domesticated species and their wild relatives, must be conserved and monitored using appropriate metrics. Building on suggestions in a recent Letter in Science (Laikre et al., 2020) we expand argumentation for three new, pragmatic genetic indicators and modifications to two current indicators for maintaining genetic diversity and adaptive capacity of all species, and provide guidance on their practical use. The indicators are: 1) the number of populations with effective population size above versus below 500, 2) the proportion of populations maintained within species, 3) the number of species and populations in which genetic diversity is monitored using DNA-based methods. We also present and discuss Goals and Action Targets for post-2020 biodiversity conservation which are connected to these indicators and underlying data. These pragmatic indicators and goals have utility beyond the CBD; they should benefit conservation and monitoring of genetic diversity via national and global policy for decades to come.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis