Technical Evaluation of Commercial Mutation Analysis Platforms and Reference Materials for Liquid Biopsy Profiling

Sabrina Weber(Medical University of Graz), Benjamin Spiegl(Medical University of Graz), Samantha Perakis(Medical University of Graz), Christine Ulz(Medical University of Graz), Peter M. Abuja(Medical University of Graz), Karl Kashofer(Medical University of Graz), Paul van der Leest(Medical University of Graz), Maria Aguirre Azpurua(University Medical Center Groningen), Menno Tamminga(University Medical Center Groningen), Dan Brudzewsky(SeraCare Life Sciences (United States)), Dominic G. Rothwell(University of Manchester), Sumitra Mohan(University of Manchester), Alexander Sartori, Rita Lampignano(Bayer (Germany)), Yves Konigshofer(SeraCare Life Sciences (United States)), Markus Sprenger‐Haussels(Qiagen (Germany)), Harriet Wikman(Universität Hamburg), Inger Riise Bergheim(Oslo University Hospital), Vera Kloten(Bayer (Germany)), Ed Schuuring(University Medical Center Groningen), Michael R. Speicher(Medical University of Graz), Ellen Heitzer(Medical University of Graz)
Cancers
June 16, 2020
Cited by 68Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Molecular profiling from liquid biopsy, in particular cell-free DNA (cfDNA), represents an attractive alternative to tissue biopsies for the detection of actionable targets and tumor monitoring. In addition to PCR-based assays, Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)-based cfDNA assays are now commercially available and are being increasingly adopted in clinical practice. However, the validity of these products as well as the clinical utility of cfDNA in the management of patients with cancer has yet to be proven. Within framework of the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) program CANCER-ID we evaluated the use of commercially available reference materials designed for ctDNA testing and cfDNA derived from Diagnostic Leukaphereses (DLA) for inter- and intra-assay as well as intra- and inter-laboratory comparisons. In three experimental setups, a broad range of assays including ddPCR, MassARRAY and various NGS-based assays were tested. We demonstrate that both reference materials with predetermined VAFs and DLA samples are extremely useful for the performance assessment of mutation analysis platforms. Moreover, our data indicate a substantial variability of NGS assays with respect to sensitivity and specificity highlighting the importance of extensive validation of the test performance before offering these tests in clinical routine practice.


Related Papers