Investigation of the safety and feasibility of AAV1/SERCA2a gene transfer in patients with chronic heart failure supported with a left ventricular assist device – the SERCA-LVAD TRIAL

Alexander R. Lyon(Lung Institute), Daphne Babalis(Imperial College London), Andrew Morley‐Smith(Harefield Hospital), Michael Hedger(Harefield Hospital), Antoni Barrientos(Harefield Hospital), Gábor Földes(Imperial College London), Liam S. Couch(Imperial College London), Rasheda A. Chowdhury(Imperial College London), Konstantinos N. Tzortzis(Imperial College London), Nicholas S. Peters(Imperial College London), Eva A. Rog‐Zielinska(University of Freiburg), H-Y Yang(Imperial College London), Sophie Welch(Harefield Hospital), Christopher T. Bowles(Harefield Hospital), Shelley Rahman Haley(Harefield Hospital), Alexandra Bell, A. L. Rice, Thiagarajah Sasikaran(Imperial College London), Nicholas Johnson(Imperial College London), Emanuela Falaschetti(Imperial College London), Jayan Parameshwar(Papworth Hospital), C. Lewis(Papworth Hospital), Steven Tsui(Papworth Hospital), André Simon(Harefield Hospital), J Pepper(Harefield Hospital), J Rudy(Celladon Corporation (United States)), K M Zsebo(Celladon Corporation (United States)), Kenneth T. MacLeod(Imperial College London), Cesare M. Terracciano(Imperial College London), Roger J. Hajjar, Nicholas R. Banner(Harefield Hospital), Siân E. Harding(Imperial College London)
Gene Therapy
July 15, 2020
Cited by 91Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Abstract The SERCA-LVAD trial was a phase 2a trial assessing the safety and feasibility of delivering an adeno-associated vector 1 carrying the cardiac isoform of the sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase (AAV1/SERCA2a) to adult chronic heart failure patients implanted with a left ventricular assist device. The SERCA-LVAD trial was one of a program of AAV1/SERCA2a cardiac gene therapy trials including CUPID1, CUPID 2 and AGENT trials. Enroled subjects were randomised to receive a single intracoronary infusion of 1 × 10 13 DNase-resistant AAV1/SERCA2a particles or a placebo solution in a double-blinded design, stratified by presence of neutralising antibodies to AAV. Elective endomyocardial biopsy was performed at 6 months unless the subject had undergone cardiac transplantation, with myocardial samples assessed for the presence of exogenous viral DNA from the treatment vector. Safety assessments including ELISPOT were serially performed. Although designed as a 24 subject trial, recruitment was stopped after five subjects had been randomised and received infusion due to the neutral result from the CUPID 2 trial. Here we describe the results from the 5 patients at 3 years follow up, which confirmed that viral DNA was delivered to the failing human heart in 2 patients receiving gene therapy with vector detectable at follow up endomyocardial biopsy or cardiac transplantation. Absolute levels of detectable transgene DNA were low, and no functional benefit was observed. There were no safety concerns in this small cohort. This trial identified some of the challenges of performing gene therapy trials in this LVAD patient cohort which may help guide future trial design.


Related Papers