Lung- and Diaphragm-Protective Ventilation

Ewan C. Goligher(University Health Network), Martin Dres(Inserm), Bhakti K. Patel(University of Chicago), Sarina K. Sahetya(Johns Hopkins University), Jeremy R. Beitler(Columbia University), Irene Telías(St. Michael's Hospital), Takeshi Yoshida(The University of Osaka), Katerina Vaporidi(University of Crete), Domenico Luca Grieco(Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), Tom Schepens(Antwerp University Hospital), Giacomo Grasselli(University of Milan), Savino Spadaro(University of Ferrara), José Dianti(University Health Network), Marcelo B. P. Amato(Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo), Giacomo Bellani(University of Milano-Bicocca), Alexandre Demoule(Inserm), Eddy Fan(University Health Network), Niall D. Ferguson(University Health Network), Dimitrios Georgopoulos(University of Crete), Claude Guérin(Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Robinder G. Khemani(University of Southern California), Franco Laghi(Loyola University Chicago), Alain Mercat(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers), Francesco Mojoli(University of Pavia), Coen A. C. Ottenheijm, Samir Jaber(Université de Montpellier), Leo Heunks(Amsterdam University Medical Centers), Jordi Mancebo(Hospital de Sant Pau), Tommaso Mauri(Antwerp University Hospital), Antonio Pesenti(Antwerp University Hospital), Laurent Brochard(St. Michael's Hospital)
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
June 9, 2020
Cited by 405Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation can cause acute diaphragm atrophy and injury, and this is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Although the importance and impact of lung-protective ventilation is widely appreciated and well established, the concept of diaphragm-protective ventilation has recently emerged as a potential complementary therapeutic strategy. This Perspective, developed from discussions at a meeting of international experts convened by PLUG (the Pleural Pressure Working Group) of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, outlines a conceptual framework for an integrated lung- and diaphragm-protective approach to mechanical ventilation on the basis of growing evidence about mechanisms of injury. We propose targets for diaphragm protection based on respiratory effort and patient-ventilator synchrony. The potential for conflict between diaphragm protection and lung protection under certain conditions is discussed; we emphasize that when conflicts arise, lung protection must be prioritized over diaphragm protection. Monitoring respiratory effort is essential to concomitantly protect both the diaphragm and the lung during mechanical ventilation. To implement lung- and diaphragm-protective ventilation, new approaches to monitoring, to setting the ventilator, and to titrating sedation will be required. Adjunctive interventions, including extracorporeal life support techniques, phrenic nerve stimulation, and clinical decision-support systems, may also play an important role in selected patients in the future. Evaluating the clinical impact of this new paradigm will be challenging, owing to the complexity of the intervention. The concept of lung- and diaphragm-protective ventilation presents a new opportunity to potentially improve clinical outcomes for critically ill patients.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis