Management of Cancer and Health After the Clinic Visit: A Call to Action for Self-Management in Cancer Care

Doris Howell(University of Toronto), Deborah K. Mayer(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Richard Fielding(Hong Kong Jockey Club), Manuela Eicher(University of Lausanne), Irma M. Verdonck‐de Leeuw(Amsterdam University Medical Centers), Christoffer Johansen(Rigshospitalet), Enrique Soto‐Pérez‐de‐Celis(Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán), Claire Foster(University of Southampton), Raymond J. Chan(Queensland University of Technology), Catherine M. Alfano(American Cancer Society), Shawna V. Hudson(Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey), Michael Jefford(Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre), Wwt Lam(Hong Kong Jockey Club), Victoria Loerzel(University of Central Florida), Gabriella Pravettoni(University of Milan), Elke Rammant(Ghent University), Lidia Schapira(Stanford University), Kevin Stein(Emory University), Bogda Koczwara(Flinders University), the Global Partners for Self-Management in Cancer
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
June 5, 2020
Cited by 223Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Individuals with cancer and their families assume responsibility for management of cancer as an acute and chronic disease. Yet, cancer lags other chronic diseases in its provision of proactive self-management support in routine, everyday care leaving this population vulnerable to worse health status, long-term disability, and poorer survival. Enabling cancer patients to manage the medical and emotional consequences and lifestyle and work changes due to cancer and treatment is essential to optimizing health and recovery across the continuum of cancer. In this paper, the Global Partners on Self-Management in Cancer puts forth six priority areas for action: Action 1: Prepare patients and survivors for active involvement in care; Action 2: Shift the care culture to support patients as partners in cocreating health and embed self-management support in everyday health-care provider practices and in care pathways; Action 3: Prepare the workforce in the knowledge and skills necessary to enable patients in effective self-management and reach consensus on core curricula; Action 4: Establish and reach consensus on a patient-reported outcome system for measuring the effects of self-management support and performance accountability; Action 5: Advance the evidence and stimulate research on self-management and self-management support in cancer populations; Action 6: Expand reach and access to self-management support programs across care sectors and tailored to diversity of need and stimulation of research to advance knowledge. It is time for a revolution to better integrate self-management support as part of high-quality, person-centered support and precision medicine in cancer care to optimize health outcomes, accelerate recovery, and possibly improve survival.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis