Thrombectomy for Stroke in the Public Health Care System of Brazil

Sheila Cristina Ouriques Martins(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Francisco Mont’Alverne(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Letícia Costa Rebello(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Daniel Giansante Abud(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Gisele Sampaio Silva(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Fabrício Oliveira Lima(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Bruno S.M. Parente(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Guilherme Seizem Nakiri(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Mário B. Faria(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Michel Eli Frudit(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), João José Freitas de Carvalho(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Eduardo Waihrich(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), José Antônio Fiorot Júnior(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Fabrício Bruno Cardoso(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Raquel C.T. Hidalgo(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Viviane Flumignan Zétola(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Fernanda Carvalho(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Ana Cláudia de Souza(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Francisco Antunes Dias(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Diego Bandeira(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Maramélia Miranda(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Mário Bernardes Wagner(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Leonardo Augusto Carbonera(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Jamary Oliveira‐Filho(Universidade Federal da Bahia), Daniel C. Bezerra(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), David S. Liebeskind(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Joseph P. Broderick(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Carlos A. Molina(Hebron University), José E. Fogolin Passos(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Jeffrey L. Saver(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Octávio Marques Pontes‐Neto(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Raul G. Nogueira(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul)
New England Journal of Medicine
June 10, 2020
Cited by 225Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials involving patients with stroke have established that outcomes are improved with the use of thrombectomy for large-vessel occlusion. These trials were performed in high-resource countries and have had limited effects on medical practice in low- and middle-income countries. METHODS: We studied the safety and efficacy of thrombectomy in the public health system of Brazil. In 12 public hospitals, patients with a proximal intracranial occlusion in the anterior circulation that could be treated within 8 hours after the onset of stroke symptoms were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive standard care plus mechanical thrombectomy (thrombectomy group) or standard care alone (control group). The primary outcome was the score on the modified Rankin scale (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]) at 90 days. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients were enrolled, including 79 who had undergone thrombectomy during an open-label roll-in period. Approximately 70% in the two groups received intravenous alteplase. The trial was stopped early because of efficacy when 221 of a planned 690 patients had undergone randomization (111 to the thrombectomy group and 110 to the control group). The common odds ratio for a better distribution of scores on the modified Rankin scale at 90 days was 2.28 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41 to 3.69; P = 0.001), favoring thrombectomy. The percentage of patients with a score on the modified Rankin scale of 0 to 2, signifying an absence of or minor neurologic deficit, was 35.1% in the thrombectomy group and 20.0% in the control group (difference, 15.1 percentage points; 95% CI, 2.6 to 27.6). Asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 51.4% of the patients in the thrombectomy group and 24.5% of those in the control group; symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 4.5% of the patients in each group. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial conducted in the public health care system of Brazil, endovascular treatment within 8 hours after the onset of stroke symptoms in conjunction with standard care resulted in better functional outcomes at 90 days than standard care alone. (Funded by the Brazilian Ministry of Health; RESILIENT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02216643.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis