First-line FOLFOX plus panitumumab versus 5FU plus panitumumab in RAS-BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer elderly patients: The PANDA study.

Sara Lonardi(Istituto Oncologico Veneto), Marta Schirripa(Istituto Oncologico Veneto), Federica Buggin(Istituto Oncologico Veneto), Lorenzo Antonuzzo(Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi), Barbara Merelli(Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII), Giorgia Boscolo, Saverio Cinieri(Ospedale A. Perrino), Samantha Di Donato(Ospedale di Prato Santo Stefano), Riccardo Lobefaro(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Roberto Moretto(Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana), Vincenzo Formica(University of Rome Tor Vergata), Alessandro Passardi(Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori), Vincenzo Ricci(Azienda Sanitaria Ospedaliera S.Croce e Carle Cuneo), Nicoletta Pella(University of Udine), Mario Scartozzi(University of Cagliari), Fable Zustovich(AULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana), Vittorina Zagonel(Istituto Oncologico Veneto), Matteo Fassan(University of Padua), Luca Boni, Fotios Loupakis(Istituto Oncologico Veneto), Gono Group
Journal of Clinical Oncology
May 20, 2020
Cited by 32

Abstract

4002 Background: Data on first-line treatment efficacy in elderly patients are limited. Many analyses adopt a questionable cut-off of 65 years and specific evidence with anti-EGFRs is low. FOLFOX-panitumumab (pan) is an option for RAS wild-type (wt) untreated mCRC patients. Guidelines recommend considering fluoropyrimidine monotherapy as an option for elderly patients, but no randomized studies have ever explored the role of the combination with an anti-EGFR. Methods: This is a prospective, open-label, multicenter phase II randomized trial. Unresectable and previously untreated RAS- BRAF wt mCRC patients aged ≥70 were randomized to receive FOLFOX-pan (arm A), or 5FU/LV-pan (arm B) for up to 12 cycles followed by pan maintenance until PD. The primary EP was PFS in both arms. Stratification criteria were age (≤75 vs > 75 years), ECOG PS (0–1 vs 2) and geriatric assessment with G8 Score (≤14 vs > 14). In each treatment arm, the null hypothesis for median PFS was set at ≤6 months. Assuming an expected median PFS time ≥9.5 months with both experimental regimens, a sample size of 90 patients in each arm granted to the study a power of 90%, with a type I error rate equal to 5% (1-sided Brookmeyer-Crowley test) for rejecting the null hypothesis. No formal comparison between the two arms was planned. Results: From Jul 2016 to Apr 2019 a total of 394 patients were screened, 211 were deemed eligible for inclusion and 185 were randomized (92 arm A and 93 arm B). Main pts’ characteristics were (arm A/B): males 66%/61%; median age 77/77y; PS≥1 49%/55%; right colon 23%/21%; G8 > 14 31%/30%. At a median follow up of 20.5 mos, 135 (arm A/B: 64/71) PD events were collected. Median PFS was 9.6 (95% CI 8.8-10.9) in arm A with FOLFOX-pan and 9.1 (95% CI 7.7-9.9) in arm B with 5FU/LV-pan. Response rates were (arm A/B): 65%/57%. Grade 3-4 toxicities were (arm A/B): neutropenia 9.8%/1.1%; diarrhea 16.3%/1.1%; stomatitis 9.8%/4.4%; neurotoxicity 3.3%/0%; fatigue 6.5%/4.4%; skin rash 25%/24.2%, hypomagnesemia 3.3%/7.7%. Conclusions: Large prospective randomized studies in molecularly selected elderly mCRC are feasible with multicenter collaborative efforts. Primary EP was met in both treatment arms. 5FU/LV plus panitumumab for up to 12 cycles followed by panitumumab maintenance until PD might be a reasonable option in elderly mCRC patients with RAS/BRAF wt tumors deserving further investigations in phase III trials. Clinical trial information: NCT02904031 .


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis