Efficacy and safety of antiviral treatment for COVID-19 from evidence in studies of SARS-CoV-2 and other acute viral infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Wei Liu(First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University), Pengxiang Zhou(Peking University), Ken Chen(Tongji Hospital), Zhikang Ye(Peking University Third Hospital), Fang Liu(Peking University Third Hospital), Xiaotong Li(Shanxi Medical University), Na He(Tongji Hospital), Ziyang Wu(Peking University), Qi Zhang(Tongji Hospital), Xuepeng Gong(Peking University Third Hospital), Qiyu Tang(Peking University), Xin Du(Tongji Hospital), Yingqiu Ying(Peking University), Xiaohan Xu(Peking University), Yahui Zhang(First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University), Jinyu Liu(Tongji Hospital), Yun Li(Tongji Hospital), Ning Shen(Tongji Hospital), Rachel Couban(Shanxi Medical University), Quazi Ibrahim(Peking University Third Hospital), Gordon Guyatt(First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University), Suodi Zhai(Shanxi Medical University)
Canadian Medical Association Journal
June 3, 2020
Cited by 87Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antiviral medications are being given empirically to some patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). To support the development of a COVID-19 management guideline, we conducted a systematic review that addressed the benefits and harms of 7 antiviral treatments for COVID-19. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed and 3 Chinese databases (CNKI, WANFANG and SinoMed) through Apr. 19, medRxiv and Chinaxiv through Apr. 27, and Chongqing VIP through Apr. 30, 2020. We included studies of ribavirin, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, umifenovir (arbidol), favipravir, interferon and lopinavir/ritonavir. If direct evidence from COVID-19 studies was not available, we included indirect evidence from studies of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) for efficacy outcomes and other acute respiratory viral infections for safety outcomes. RESULTS: In patients with nonsevere COVID-19 illness, the death rate was extremely low, precluding an important effect on mortality. We found only very low-quality evidence with little or no suggestion of benefit for most treatments and outcomes in both nonsevere and severe COVID-19. An exception was treatment with lopinavir/ritonavir, for which we found low-quality evidence for a decrease in length of stay in the intensive care unit (risk difference 5 d shorter, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0 to 9 d) and hospital stay (risk difference 1 d shorter, 95% CI 0 to 2 d). For safety outcomes, evidence was of low or very low quality, with the exception of treatment with lopinavir/ritonavir for which moderate-quality evidence suggested likely increases in diarrhea, nausea and vomiting. INTERPRETATION: To date, persuasive evidence of important benefit in COVID-19 does not exist for any antiviral treatments, although for each treatment evidence has not excluded important benefit. Additional randomized controlled trials involving patients with COVID-19 will be needed before such treatments can be administered with confidence.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis