Empagliflozin in Heart Failure

Matthew D. Griffin(Yale University), Veena S. Rao(Yale University), Juan B. Ivey‐Miranda(Mexican Social Security Institute), James H. Fleming(Yale University), Devin Mahoney(Yale University), Christopher Maulion(Yale University), Nisha Suda(Albert Einstein College of Medicine), Krishmita Siwakoti(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Tariq Ahmad(Yale University), Daniel Jacoby(Yale University), Ralph J. Riello(Yale University), Lavanya Bellumkonda(Yale University), Zachary L. Cox(Lipscomb University), Sean P. Collins(Vanderbilt University Medical Center), Sangchoon Jeon(Yale University), Jeffrey M. Turner(Yale University), F. Perry Wilson(Yale University), Javed Butler(University of Mississippi), Silvio E. Inzucchi(Yale University), Jeffrey M. Testani(Yale University)
Circulation
May 15, 2020
Cited by 402Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors improve heart failure–related outcomes. The mechanisms underlying these benefits are not well understood, but diuretic properties may contribute. Traditional diuretics such as furosemide induce substantial neurohormonal activation, contributing to the limited improvement in intravascular volume often seen with these agents. However, the proximal tubular site of action of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors may help circumvent these limitations. Methods: Twenty patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic, stable heart failure completed a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study of empagliflozin 10 mg daily versus placebo. Patients underwent an intensive 6-hour biospecimen collection and cardiorenal phenotyping at baseline and again after 14 days of study drug. After a 2-week washout, patients crossed over to the alternate therapy with the above protocol repeated. Results: Oral empagliflozin was rapidly absorbed as evidenced by a 27-fold increase in urinary glucose excretion by 3 hours ( P <0.0001). Fractional excretion of sodium increased significantly with empagliflozin monotherapy versus placebo (fractional excretion of sodium, 1.2±0.7% versus 0.7±0.4%; P =0.001), and there was a synergistic effect in combination with bumetanide (fractional excretion of sodium, 5.8±2.5% versus 3.9±1.9%; P =0.001). At 14 days, the natriuretic effect of empagliflozin persisted, resulting in a reduction in blood volume (−208 mL [interquartile range, −536 to 153 mL] versus −14 mL [interquartile range, −282 to 335 mL]; P =0.035) and plasma volume (−138 mL, interquartile range, −379 to 154±453 mL; P =0.04). This natriuresis was not, however, associated with evidence of neurohormonal activation because the change in norepinephrine was superior ( P =0.02) and all other neurohormones were similar ( P <0.34) during the empagliflozin versus placebo period. Furthermore, there was no evidence of potassium wasting ( P =0.20) or renal dysfunction ( P >0.11 for all biomarkers), whereas both serum magnesium ( P <0.001) and uric acid levels ( P =0.008) improved. Conclusions: Empagliflozin causes significant natriuresis, particularly when combined with loop diuretics, resulting in an improvement in blood volume. However, off-target electrolyte wasting, renal dysfunction, and neurohormonal activation were not observed. This favorable diuretic profile may offer significant advantage in the management of volume status in patients with heart failure and may represent a mechanism contributing to the superior long-term heart failure outcomes observed with these agents. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03027960.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis