2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Classification Criteria for Primary Sjögren's Syndrome: A Consensus and Data‐Driven Methodology Involving Three International Patient Cohorts

Caroline H. Shiboski(University of California, San Francisco), Stephen Shiboski(University of California, San Francisco), Raphaèle Séror(Université Paris-Sud), Lindsey A. Criswell(University of California, San Francisco), Marc Labétoulle(Université Paris-Sud), Thomas M. Lietman(University of California, San Francisco), Astrid Rasmussen(Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation), R. Hal Scofield(Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation), Claudio Vitali(Casa di Cura San Michele), Simon Bowman(University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust), Xavier Mariette(Université Paris-Sud), the International Sjögren's Syndrome Criteria Working Group
Arthritis & Rheumatology
October 26, 2016
Cited by 1,887Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an international set of classification criteria for primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS) using guidelines from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). These criteria were developed for use in individuals with signs and/or symptoms suggestive of SS. METHODS: We assigned preliminary importance weights to a consensus list of candidate criteria items, using multi-criteria decision analysis. We tested and adapted the resulting draft criteria using existing cohort data on primary SS cases and non-SS controls, with case/non-case status derived from expert clinical judgment. We then validated the performance of the classification criteria in a separate cohort of patients. RESULTS: , each scoring 3; an abnormal ocular staining score of ≥5 (or van Bijsterveld score of ≥4), a Schirmer's test result of ≤5 mm/5 minutes, and an unstimulated salivary flow rate of ≤0.1 ml/minute, each scoring 1. Individuals with signs and/or symptoms suggestive of SS who have a total score of ≥4 for the above items meet the criteria for primary SS. Sensitivity and specificity against clinician-expert-derived case/non-case status in the final validation cohort were high, i.e., 96% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 92-98%) and 95% (95% CI 92-97%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Using methodology consistent with other recent ACR/EULAR-approved classification criteria, we developed a single set of data-driven consensus classification criteria for primary SS, which performed well in validation analyses and are well-suited as criteria for enrollment in clinical trials.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis