International Assessment of DSM-5 and ICD-11 Personality Disorder Traits: Toward a Common Nosology in DSM-5.1

Bo Bach(Region Zealand), André Kerber(Freie Universität Berlin), Antón Aluja(Universitat de Lleida), Tim Bastiaens(KU Leuven), Jared W. Keeley(Virginia Commonwealth University), Laurence Claes(University of Antwerp), Andrea Fossati(Vita-Salute San Raffaele University), Fernando Gutiérrez(Hospital Clínic de Barcelona), Sérgio Eduardo Silva de Oliveira(Universidade de Brasília), Rute Pires(University of Lisbon), Karel D. Riegel(Charles University), Jean-Pierre Rolland(Université Paris Nanterre), Isabelle Roskam(UCLouvain), Martin Sellbom(University of Otago), Antonella Somma(Vita-Salute San Raffaele University), Lucas Spanemberg(Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul), Włodzimierz Strus(Institute of Psychology), Jens C. Thimm(UiT The Arctic University of Norway), Aidan G.C. Wright(University of Pittsburgh), Johannes Zimmermann(University of Kassel)
Psychopathology
January 1, 2020
Cited by 196Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) and the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders (PD) are largely commensurate and, when combined, they delineate 6 trait domains: negative affectivity, detachment, antagonism/dissociality, disinhibition, anankastia, and psychoticism. OBJECTIVE: The present study evaluated the international validity of a brief 36-item patient-report measure that portrays all 6 domains simultaneously including 18 primary subfacets. METHODS: We developed and employed a modified version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 - Brief Form Plus (PID5BF+). A total of 16,327 individuals were included, 2,347 of whom were patients. The expected 6-factor structure of facets was initially investigated in samples from Denmark (n = 584), Germany (n = 1,271), and the USA (n = 605) and subsequently replicated in both patient- and community samples from Italy, France, Switzerland, Belgium, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Poland, Czech Republic, the USA, and Brazil. Associations with interview-rated DSM-5 PD categories were also investigated. RESULTS: Findings generally supported the empirical soundness and international robustness of the 6 domains including meaningful associations with familiar interview-rated PD types. CONCLUSIONS: The modified PID5BF+ may be employed internationally by clinicians and researchers for brief and reliable assessment of the 6 combined DSM-5 and ICD-11 domains, including 18 primary subfacets. This 6-domain framework may inform a future nosology for DSM-5.1 that is more reasonably aligned with the authoritative ICD-11 codes than the current DSM-5 AMPD model. The 36-item modified PID5BF+ scoring key is provided in online supplementary Appendix A see www.karger.com/doi/10.1159/000507589 (for all online suppl. material).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis