Olaparib for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Johann S. de Bono(Université Paris-Sud), Joaquı́n Mateo(Université Paris-Sud), Karim Fizazi(Université Paris-Sud), Fred Saad(Université Paris-Sud), Neal D. Shore(Université Paris-Sud), Shahneen Sandhu(Université Paris-Sud), Kim N.(Université Paris-Sud), Oliver Sartor(Université Paris-Sud), Neeraj Agarwal(Université Paris-Sud), David Olmos(Université Paris-Sud), Antoine Thiery-Vuillemin(Université Paris-Sud), Przemyslaw Twardowski(Université Paris-Sud), Niven Mehra(Université Paris-Sud), Carsten Goessl(Université Paris-Sud), Jinyu Kang(Université Paris-Sud), Joseph E. Burgents(Université Paris-Sud), Wenting Wu(Université Paris-Sud), Alexander Kohlmann(Université Paris-Sud), Carrie A. Adelman(Université Paris-Sud), Maha Hussain(Université Paris-Sud)
New England Journal of Medicine
April 28, 2020
Cited by 2,222Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple loss-of-function alterations in genes that are involved in DNA repair, including homologous recombination repair, are associated with response to poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition in patients with prostate and other cancers. METHODS: ; cohort B (142 patients) had alterations in any of 12 other prespecified genes, prospectively and centrally determined from tumor tissue. Patients were randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) to receive olaparib or the physician's choice of enzalutamide or abiraterone (control). The primary end point was imaging-based progression-free survival in cohort A according to blinded independent central review. RESULTS: In cohort A, imaging-based progression-free survival was significantly longer in the olaparib group than in the control group (median, 7.4 months vs. 3.6 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.25 to 0.47; P<0.001); a significant benefit was also observed with respect to the confirmed objective response rate and the time to pain progression. The median overall survival in cohort A was 18.5 months in the olaparib group and 15.1 months in the control group; 81% of the patients in the control group who had progression crossed over to receive olaparib. A significant benefit for olaparib was also seen for imaging-based progression-free survival in the overall population (cohorts A and B). Anemia and nausea were the main toxic effects in patients who received olaparib. CONCLUSIONS: In men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had disease progression while receiving enzalutamide or abiraterone and who had alterations in genes with a role in homologous recombination repair, olaparib was associated with longer progression-free survival and better measures of response and patient-reported end points than either enzalutamide or abiraterone. (Funded by AstraZeneca and Merck Sharp & Dohme; PROfound ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02987543.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis