Daratumumab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the GRIFFIN trial

Peter M. Voorhees(Levine Cancer Institute), Jonathan L. Kaufman(Emory University), Jacob P. Laubach(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Douglas W. Sborov(University of Utah), Brandi Reeves(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Cesar Rodriguez(Wake Forest University), Ajai Chari(Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai), Rebecca Silbermann(Oregon Health & Science University), Luciano J. Costa(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Larry D. Anderson(Southwestern Medical Center), Nitya Nathwani(City of Hope), Nina Shah(University of California, San Francisco), Yvonne A. Efebera(The Ohio State University), Sarah A. Holstein(University of Nebraska Medical Center), Caitlin Costello(University of California San Diego), Andrzej Jakubowiak(University of Chicago Medical Center), Tanya M. Wildes(Washington University in St. Louis), Robert Z. Orlowski(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Kenneth H. Shain(Moffitt Cancer Center), Andrew J. Cowan(University of Washington Medical Center), Séan Murphy(Janssen (United States)), Yana Lutska(Janssen (United States)), Huiling Pei(Janssen (United States)), Jon Ukropec(Janssen (United States)), Jessica Vermeulen(Janssen (Netherlands)), Carla de Boer(Janssen (Netherlands)), Daniela Hoehn(Janssen (United States)), Thomas S. Lin(Janssen (United States)), Paul G. Richardson(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)
Blood
April 23, 2020
Cited by 674Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is standard frontline therapy for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). The addition of daratumumab (D) to RVd (D-RVd) in transplant-eligible NDMM patients was evaluated. Patients (N = 207) were randomized 1:1 to D-RVd or RVd induction (4 cycles), ASCT, D-RVd or RVd consolidation (2 cycles), and lenalidomide or lenalidomide plus D maintenance (26 cycles). The primary end point, stringent complete response (sCR) rate by the end of post-ASCT consolidation, favored D-RVd vs RVd (42.4% vs 32.0%; odds ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-2.82; 1-sided P = .068) and met the prespecified 1-sided α of 0.10. With longer follow-up (median, 22.1 months), responses deepened; sCR rates improved for D-RVd vs RVd (62.6% vs 45.4%; P = .0177), as did minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (10-5 threshold) rates in the intent-to-treat population (51.0% vs 20.4%; P < .0001). Four patients (3.8%) in the D-RVd group and 7 patients (6.8%) in the RVd group progressed; respective 24-month progression-free survival rates were 95.8% and 89.8%. Grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events were more common with D-RVd. More infections occurred with D-RVd, but grade 3/4 infection rates were similar. Median CD34+ cell yield was 8.2 × 106/kg for D-RVd and 9.4 × 106/kg for RVd, although plerixafor use was more common with D-RVd. Median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were comparable. Daratumumab with RVd induction and consolidation improved depth of response in patients with transplant-eligible NDMM, with no new safety concerns. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02874742.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis