CD4/CD8 T-Cell Selection Affects Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Potency and Toxicity: Updated Results From a Phase I Anti-CD22 CAR T-Cell Trial

Nirali N. Shah(National Institutes of Health), Steven L. Highfill(National Institutes of Health Clinical Center), Haneen Shalabi(National Institutes of Health), Bonnie Yates(National Institutes of Health), Jianjian Jin(National Institutes of Health Clinical Center), Pamela L. Wolters(National Institutes of Health), Amanda K. Ombrello(National Institutes of Health), Seth M. Steinberg(Office of the Director), Staci Martin(National Institutes of Health), Cindy Delbrook(National Institutes of Health), Leah Hoffman(National Institutes of Health), Lauren Little(National Institutes of Health), Anusha Ponduri(National Institutes of Health), Haiying Qin(National Institutes of Health), Haris Qureshi(National Institutes of Health), Alina Dulau‐Florea(National Institutes of Health), Dalia Salem(National Institutes of Health), Hao‐Wei Wang(National Institutes of Health), Constance M. Yuan(National Institutes of Health), Maryalice Stetler‐Stevenson(National Institutes of Health), Sandhya R. Panch(National Institutes of Health Clinical Center), Minh Tran(National Institutes of Health Clinical Center), Crystal L. Mackall(National Institutes of Health), David F. Stroncek(National Institutes of Health Clinical Center), Terry J. Fry(National Institutes of Health)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
April 14, 2020
Cited by 413Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE Patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia who experience relapse after or are resistant to CD19-targeted immunotherapies have limited treatment options. Targeting CD22, an alternative B-cell antigen, represents an alternate strategy. We report outcomes on the largest patient cohort treated with CD22 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a single-center, phase I, 3 + 3 dose-escalation trial with a large expansion cohort that tested CD22-targeted CAR T cells for children and young adults with relapsed/refractory CD22 + malignancies. Primary objectives were to assess the safety, toxicity, and feasibility. Secondary objectives included efficacy, CD22 CAR T-cell persistence, and cytokine profiling. RESULTS Fifty-eight participants were infused; 51 (87.9%) after prior CD19-targeted therapy. Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 50 participants (86.2%) and was grade 1-2 in 45 (90%). Symptoms of neurotoxicity were minimal and transient. Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis–like manifestations were seen in 19/58 (32.8%) of subjects, prompting utilization of anakinra. CD4/CD8 T-cell selection of the apheresis product improved CAR T-cell manufacturing feasibility as well as heightened inflammatory toxicities, leading to dose de-escalation. The complete remission rate was 70%. The median overall survival was 13.4 months (95% CI, 7.7 to 20.3 months). Among those who achieved a complete response, the median relapse-free survival was 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.1 to 6.5 months). Thirteen participants proceeded to stem-cell transplantation. CONCLUSION In the largest experience of CD22 CAR T-cells to our knowledge, we provide novel information on the impact of manufacturing changes on clinical outcomes and report on unique CD22 CAR T-cell toxicities and toxicity mitigation strategies. The remission induction rate supports further development of CD22 CAR T cells as a therapeutic option in patients resistant to CD19-targeted immunotherapy.


Related Papers