Oral cedazuridine/decitabine for MDS and CMML: a phase 2 pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic randomized crossover study

Guillermo Garcia‐Manero(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Elizabeth A. Griffiths(Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center), David P. Steensma(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Gail J. Roboz(NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital), Richard A. Wells(Sunnybrook Health Science Centre), James McCloskey(Hackensack University Medical Center), Olatoyosi Odenike(University of Chicago), Amy E. DeZern(Johns Hopkins University), Karen Yee(Princess Margaret Cancer Centre), Lambert Busque(Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont), Casey L. O’Connell(USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center), Laura C. Michaelis(Medical College of Wisconsin), Joseph Brandwein(Alberta Hospital Edmonton), Hagop M. Kantarjian(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Aram Oganesian(Astex Pharmaceuticals), Mohammad Azab(Astex Pharmaceuticals), Michael R. Savona(Vanderbilt University)
Blood
April 13, 2020
Cited by 210Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

This phase 2 study was designed to compare systemic decitabine exposure, demethylation activity, and safety in the first 2 cycles with cedazuridine 100 mg/decitabine 35 mg vs standard decitabine 20 mg/m2 IV. Adults with International Prognostic Scoring System intermediate-1/2- or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) were randomized 1:1 to receive oral cedazuridine/decitabine or IV decitabine in cycle 1, followed by crossover to the other treatment in cycle 2. All patients received oral cedazuridine/decitabine in subsequent cycles. Cedazuridine and decitabine were given initially as separate capsules in a dose-confirmation stage and then as a single fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet. Primary end points: mean decitabine systemic exposure (geometric least-squares mean [LSM]) of oral/IV 5-day area under curve from time 0 to last measurable concentration (AUClast), percentage long interspersed nuclear element 1 (LINE-1) DNA demethylation for oral cedazuridine/decitabine vs IV decitabine, and clinical response. Eighty patients were randomized and treated. Oral/IV ratios of geometric LSM 5-day AUClast (80% confidence interval) were 93.5% (82.1-106.5) and 97.6% (80.5-118.3) for the dose-confirmation and FDC stages, respectively. Differences in mean %LINE-1 demethylation between oral and IV were ≤1%. Clinical responses were observed in 48 patients (60%), including 17 (21%) with complete response. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events regardless of causality were neutropenia (46%), thrombocytopenia (38%), and febrile neutropenia (29%). Oral cedazuridine/decitabine (100/35 mg) produced similar systemic decitabine exposure, DNA demethylation, and safety vs decitabine 20 mg/m2 IV in the first 2 cycles, with similar efficacy. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02103478.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis