Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2−Specific Antibody Responses in Coronavirus Disease Patients

Nisreen M.A. Okba(Utrecht University), Marcel A. Müller(Utrecht University), Wentao Li(Utrecht University), Chunyan Wang(Utrecht University), Corine H. GeurtsvanKessel(Utrecht University), Victor M. Corman(Utrecht University), Mart M. Lamers(Utrecht University), Reina S. Sikkema(Utrecht University), Erwin de Bruin(Utrecht University), Felicity Chandler(Utrecht University), Yazdan Yazdanpanah(Utrecht University), Quentin Le Hingrat(Utrecht University), Diane Descamps(Utrecht University), Nadhira Houhou‐Fidouh(Utrecht University), Chantal Reusken(Utrecht University), Berend‐Jan Bosch(Utrecht University), Christian Drosten(Utrecht University), Marion Koopmans(Utrecht University), Bart L. Haagmans(Utrecht University)
Emerging infectious diseases
April 8, 2020
Cited by 1,667Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

A new coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has recently emerged to cause a human pandemic. Although molecular diagnostic tests were rapidly developed, serologic assays are still lacking, yet urgently needed. Validated serologic assays are needed for contact tracing, identifying the viral reservoir, and epidemiologic studies. We developed serologic assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing, spike protein-specific, and nucleocapsid-specific antibodies. Using serum samples from patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections, other coronaviruses, or other respiratory pathogenic infections, we validated and tested various antigens in different in-house and commercial ELISAs. We demonstrated that most PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infected persons seroconverted by 2 weeks after disease onset. We found that commercial S1 IgG or IgA ELISAs were of lower specificity, and sensitivity varied between the 2 assays; the IgA ELISA showed higher sensitivity. Overall, the validated assays described can be instrumental for detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies for diagnostic, seroepidemiologic, and vaccine evaluation studies.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis