Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2 in Patients With Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019

Juanjuan Zhao(Shenzhen Third People’s Hospital), Quan Yuan(Xiamen University), Haiyan Wang(Shenzhen Third People’s Hospital), Wei Liu(Xiamen University), Xuejiao Liao(Shenzhen Third People’s Hospital), Yingying Su(Xiamen University), Xin Wang(Shenzhen Third People’s Hospital), Jing Yuan(Shenzhen Third People’s Hospital), Tingdong Li(Xiamen University), Jinxiu Li(Shenzhen Third People’s Hospital), Shen Qian(Shenzhen Third People’s Hospital), Congming Hong(Xiamen University), Fuxiang Wang(Shenzhen Third People’s Hospital), Yingxia Liu(Southern University of Science and Technology), Zhaoqin Wang(Southern University of Science and Technology), Qing He(Southern University of Science and Technology), Zhiyong Li(Xiamen University), Bin He(Xiamen University), Tianying Zhang(Xiamen University), Yang Fu(Southern University of Science and Technology), Shengxiang Ge(Xiamen University), Lei Liu(Southern University of Science and Technology), Jun Zhang(Xiamen University), Ningshao Xia(Xiamen University), Zheng Zhang(Southern University of Science and Technology)
Clinical Infectious Diseases
March 27, 2020
Cited by 2,669Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is a newly emerging virus. The antibody response in infected patients remains largely unknown, and the clinical value of antibody testing has not been fully demonstrated. METHODS: 173 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled. Their serial plasma samples (n = 535) collected during hospitalization were tested for total antibodies (Ab), IgM, and IgG against SARS-CoV-2. The dynamics of antibodies with disease progress were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 173 patients, the seroconversion rates for Ab, IgM, and IgG were 93.1%, 82.7%, and 64.7%, respectively. The reason for the negative antibody findings in 12 patients might be due to the lack of blood samples at the later stage of illness. The median seroconversion times for Ab, IgM, and then IgG were days 11, 12, and 4, respectively. The presence of antibodies was <40% among patients within 1 week of onset, and rapidly increased to 100.0% (Ab), 94.3% (IgM), and 79.8% (IgG) by day 15 after onset. In contrast, RNA detectability decreased from 66.7% (58/87) in samples collected before day 7 to 45.5% (25/55) during days 15-39. Combining RNA and antibody detection significantly improved the sensitivity of pathogenic diagnosis for COVID-19 (P < .001), even in the early phase of 1 week from onset (P = .007). Moreover, a higher titer of Ab was independently associated with a worse clinical classification (P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Antibody detection offers vital clinical information during the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The findings provide strong empirical support for the routine application of serological testing in the diagnosis and management of COVID-19 patients.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis