Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Guidelines on the Management of Critically Ill Adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Waleed Alhazzani(Impact), Morten Hylander Møller(Society of Critical Care Medicine), Yaseen M. Arabi(King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences), Mark Loeb(Impact), Michelle N. Gong(Albert Einstein College of Medicine), Eddy Fan(University of Toronto), Simon Oczkowski(Impact), Mitchell M. Levy(Brown University), Lennie Derde(Utrecht University), Amy Dzierba(NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital), Bin Du(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Michael S. Aboodi(Albert Einstein College of Medicine), Hannah Wunsch(Sunnybrook Health Science Centre), Maurizio Cecconi(Albert Einstein College of Medicine), Younsuck Koh(Ulsan College), Daniel S. Chertow(Rhode Island Hospital), Kathryn Maitland(Impact), Fayez Alshamsi(United Arab Emirates University), Emilie P. Belley‐Côté(Population Health Research Institute), Massimiliano Greco(Albert Einstein College of Medicine), Matthew Laundy(St George's, University of London), Jill S. Morgan(Emory University Hospital), Jozef Kesecioğlu(Utrecht University), Allison McGeer(King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences), Leonard A. Mermel(Brown University), Manoj J. Mammen(Albert Einstein College of Medicine), Paul Alexander(University of Toronto), Amy S. Arrington(Baylor College of Medicine), John Centofanti(Rhode Island Hospital), Giuseppe Citerio(Copenhagen University Hospital), Bandar Baw(King Abdulaziz Medical City), Ziad A. Memish(King Saud Medical City), Naomi Hammond(King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences), Frederick G. Hayden(Albert Einstein College of Medicine), Laura Evans(University of Toronto), Andrew Rhodes(St George's, University of London)
Critical Care Medicine
March 25, 2020
Cited by 1,619Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of a rapidly spreading illness, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), affecting thousands of people around the world. Urgent guidance for clinicians caring for the sickest of these patients is needed. METHODS: We formed a panel of 36 experts from 12 countries. All panel members completed the World Health Organization conflict of interest disclosure form. The panel proposed 53 questions that are relevant to the management of COVID-19 in the ICU. We searched the literature for direct and indirect evidence on the management of COVID-19 in critically ill patients in the ICU. We identified relevant and recent systematic reviews on most questions relating to supportive care. We assessed the certainty in the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, then generated recommendations based on the balance between benefit and harm, resource and cost implications, equity, and feasibility. Recommendations were either strong or weak, or in the form of best practice recommendations. RESULTS: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign COVID-19 panel issued 54 statements, of which four are best practice statements, nine are strong recommendations, and 35 are weak recommendations. No recommendation was provided for six questions. The topics were: 1) infection control, 2) laboratory diagnosis and specimens, 3) hemodynamic support, 4) ventilatory support, and 5) COVID-19 therapy. CONCLUSION: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign COVID-19 panel issued several recommendations to help support healthcare workers caring for critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19. When available, we will provide new evidence in further releases of these guidelines.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis