NRG/RTOG 1122: A phase 2, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled study of bevacizumab with and without trebananib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma or gliosarcoma

Eudocia Q. Lee(Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center), Peixin Zhang(American College of Radiology), Patrick Y. Wen(Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center), Elizabeth R. Gerstner(Massachusetts General Hospital), David A. Reardon(Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center), Kenneth Aldape(Toronto General Hospital), John DeGroot(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Edward Pan(The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center), Jeffrey J. Raizer(Northwestern University), Lyndon J. Kim(Thomas Jefferson University Hospital), Steven J. Chmura(University of Chicago), H. Ian Robins(UW Health University Hospital), Jennifer Connelly(Froedtert Hospital), James Battiste(University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center), John L. Villano(University of Kentucky), Naveed Wagle(University of Southern California), Ryan Merrell(NorthShore University HealthSystem), Merideth M Wendland(Willamette Valley Cancer Institute and Research Center), Minesh P. Mehta(Baptist Hospital of Miami)
Cancer
March 10, 2020
Cited by 41Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) alone does not improve overall survival (OS) in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). The angiopoiein (Ang)-TIE2 system may play a role in tumor survival under VEGF inhibition. We conducted a phase 2, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of bevacizumab plus trebananib (a novel Fc fusion protein that sequesters Ang1/Ang2) over bevacizumab alone in rGBM. METHODS: Patients ≥18 years of age with a Karnofsky performance status ≥70 and GBM or variants in first or second relapse were randomized to bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus trebananib 15 mg/kg every week or bevacizumab plus placebo. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: After an initial 6-patient lead-in cohort confirmed the safety of combining bevacizumab and trebananib, 115 eligible patients were randomized to the control (n = 58) or experimental treatment (n = 57). In the control arm, 6-month PFS was 41.1%, median survival time was 11.5 months (95% CI, 8.4-14.2 months), median PFS was 4.8 months (95% CI, 3.8-7.1 months), and radiographic response (RR) was 5.9%. In the experimental arm, 6-month PFS was 22.6%, median survival time was 7.5 months (95% CI, 6.8-10.1 months), median PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.7-5.6 months), and RR was 4.2%. The rate of severe toxicities was not significantly different between arms. CONCLUSION: The combination of bevacizumab and trebananib was well tolerated but did not significantly improve 6-month PFS rate, PFS, or OS for patients with rGBM over bevacizumab alone. The shorter PFS in the experimental arm with a hazard ratio of 1.51 (P = .04) suggests that the addition of trebananib to bevacizumab is detrimental.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis