Why conservation biology can benefit from sensory ecology
Davide M. Dominoni(UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology), Jesse R. Barber(Boise State University), Megan F. McKenna(National Park Service), Elizabeth K. Perkin(Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries), Brett Seymoure(Colorado State University), David C. Stoner(Utah State University), Clinton D. Francis(California Polytechnic State University), Emily Baird(Stockholm University), Jennifer B. Tennessen(Western Washington University), Wouter Halfwerk(Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), Luke P. Tyrrell(State University of New York), Esteban Fernández‐Juricic(State Street (United States)), Neil Carter(University of Michigan), Rachel T. Buxton(Colorado State University), Kurt M. Fristrup(National Park Service), Daniel J. Mennitt(Colorado State University), Ashley Wilson(California Polytechnic State University), Cory A. Toth(Environment and Climate Change Canada)
Cited by 286
Related Papers
The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms
|Trends in Ecology & Evolution|2009|996
A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife
|Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society|2015|849
Light pollution is a driver of insect declines
|Biological Conservation|2019|403
Noise pollution is pervasive in U.S. protected areas
|Science|2017|313
Inter‐specific variation in avian responses to human disturbance
|Journal of Applied Ecology|2005|284