A standard set of person‐centred outcomes for diabetes mellitus: results of an international and unified approach

Jana Nano(Helmholtz Zentrum München), Fabrizio Carinci(University of Bologna), Oluwakemi Okunade, Spence Whittaker, Magdalena Walbaum(University College London), Katharine Barnard‐Kelly(Bournemouth University), Daniel Barthelmes(The University of Sydney), Tim Benson(St John of Jerusalem Eye Hospital Group), Ronit Calderon‐Margalit(Hebrew University of Jerusalem), J. Dennaoui(Abu Dhabi Health Services), Sonya Fraser(Central America Health Sciences University), Robert Haig(St John of Jerusalem Eye Hospital Group), Sergio Hernández-Jiménez(Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán), Naomi Levitt(University of Cape Town), Jean Claude Mbanya(Université de Yaoundé I), Syed Naqvi(Imperial College London Diabetes Centre), Annette Peters(University of Southern California), Mark Peyrot(Loyola University Maryland), M. Prabhaharan(St John of Jerusalem Eye Hospital Group), Andrew S. Pumerantz(Western University of Health Sciences), João Filipe Raposo(Associacao Protectora dos Diabeticos de Portugal), Maria Santana(University of Calgary), Andreas Schmitt(German Diabetes Center Mergentheim), Søren Skovlund(Steno Diabetes Centers), Ana Cristina García-Ulloa(Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán), Hwee Lin Wee(National University of Singapore), Jelka Zaletel(Ljubljana University Medical Centre), Massimo Massi‐Benedetti
Diabetic Medicine
March 3, 2020
Cited by 148Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

AIMS: To select a core list of standard outcomes for diabetes to be routinely applied internationally, including patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a structured systematic review of outcome measures, focusing on adults with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes. This process was followed by a consensus-driven modified Delphi panel, including a multidisciplinary group of academics, health professionals and people with diabetes. External feedback to validate the set of outcome measures was sought from people with diabetes and health professionals. RESULTS: The panel identified an essential set of clinical outcomes related to diabetes control, acute events, chronic complications, health service utilisation, and survival that can be measured using routine administrative data and/or clinical records. Three instruments were recommended for annual measurement of patient-reported outcome measures: the WHO Well-Being Index for psychological well-being; the depression module of the Patient Health Questionnaire for depression; and the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale for diabetes distress. A range of factors related to demographic, diagnostic profile, lifestyle, social support and treatment of diabetes were also identified for case-mix adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the standard set identified in this study for use in routine practice to monitor, benchmark and improve diabetes care. The inclusion of patient-reported outcomes enables people living with diabetes to report directly on their condition in a structured way.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis