Mapping human pressures on biodiversity across the planet uncovers anthropogenic threat complexes

Diana E. Bowler(Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research), Anne D. Bjorkman(Göteborgs Stads), María Dornelas(University of St Andrews), Isla H. Myers‐Smith(University of Edinburgh), Laetitia M. Navarro(German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research), Aidin Niamir(Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre), Sarah R. Supp(Denison University), Conor Waldock(National Oceanography Centre), Marten Winter(German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research), Mark Vellend(Université de Sherbrooke), Shane A. Blowes(German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research), Katrin Böhning‐Gaese(Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre), Helge Bruelheide(German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research), Robin Elahi(Smithsonian Marine Station), Laura H. Antão(University of Helsinki), Jes Hines(German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research), Forest Isbell(University of Minnesota), Holly P. Jones(Northern Illinois University), Anne E. Magurran(University of St Andrews), Juliano Sarmento Cabral(University of Würzburg), Amanda E. Bates(Memorial University of Newfoundland)
People and Nature
February 27, 2020
Cited by 281Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Abstract Climate change and other anthropogenic drivers of biodiversity change are unequally distributed across the world. Overlap in the distributions of different drivers have important implications for biodiversity change attribution and the potential for interactive effects. However, the spatial relationships among different drivers and whether they differ between the terrestrial and marine realm has yet to be examined. We compiled global gridded datasets on climate change, land‐use, resource exploitation, pollution, alien species potential and human population density. We used multivariate statistics to examine the spatial relationships among the drivers and to characterize the typical combinations of drivers experienced by different regions of the world. We found stronger positive correlations among drivers in the terrestrial than in the marine realm, leading to areas with high intensities of multiple drivers on land. Climate change tended to be negatively correlated with other drivers in the terrestrial realm (e.g. in the tundra and boreal forest with high climate change but low human use and pollution), whereas the opposite was true in the marine realm (e.g. in the Indo‐Pacific with high climate change and high fishing). We show that different regions of the world can be defined by Anthropogenic Threat Complexes (ATCs), distinguished by different sets of drivers with varying intensities. We identify 11 ATCs that can be used to test hypotheses about patterns of biodiversity and ecosystem change, especially about the joint effects of multiple drivers. Our global analysis highlights the broad conservation priorities needed to mitigate the impacts of anthropogenic change, with different priorities emerging on land and in the ocean, and in different parts of the world.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis