Australian consensus statements for the regulation, production and use of faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice

Craig Haifer(The University of Sydney), Colleen Kelly(Brown University), Sudarshan Paramsothy(The University of Sydney), David Andresen(The University of Sydney), Lito E. Papanicolas(Royal Adelaide Hospital), Genevieve McKew(The University of Sydney), Thomas J. Borody(Centre For Digestive Diseases), Michael A. Kamm(The University of Melbourne), Samuel P. Costello(Queen Elizabeth Hospital), Jane M. Andrews(Royal Adelaide Hospital), Jakob Begun(The University of Queensland), Hiu Tat Chan(Myer Foundation), Susan J. Connor(Liverpool Hospital), Simon Ghaly(UNSW Sydney), Paul D. R. Johnson(The University of Melbourne), Daniel A. Lemberg(UNSW Sydney), Ramesh Paramsothy(Blacktown & Mount Druitt Hospital), Andrew M. Redmond(The University of Queensland), Harsha Sheorey(St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne), David van der Poorten(The University of Sydney), Rupert W. Leong(The University of Sydney)
Gut
February 11, 2020
Cited by 101

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: infection, and there is interest in its potential application in other gastrointestinal and systemic diseases. However, the recent death and episode of septicaemia following FMT highlights the need for further appraisal and guidelines on donor evaluation, production standards, treatment facilities and acceptable clinical indications. DESIGN: For these consensus statements, a 24-member multidisciplinary working group voted online and then convened in-person, using a modified Delphi approach to formulate and refine a series of recommendations based on best evidence and expert opinion. Invitations to participate were directed to Australian experts, with an international delegate assisting the development. The following issues regarding the use of FMT in clinical practice were addressed: donor selection and screening, clinical indications, requirements of FMT centres and future directions. Evidence was rated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on 27 statements to provide guidance on best practice in FMT. These include: (1) minimum standards for donor screening with recommended clinical selection criteria, blood and stool testing; (2) accepted routes of administration; (3) clinical indications; (4) minimum standards for FMT production and requirements for treatment facilities acknowledging distinction between single-site centres (eg, hospital-based) and stool banks; and (5) recommendations on future research and product development. CONCLUSIONS: These FMT consensus statements provide comprehensive recommendations around the production and use of FMT in clinical practice with relevance to clinicians, researchers and policy makers.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis