Neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor (Sintilimab) in NSCLC

Shugeng Gao(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Ning Li(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Shun‐Yu Gao(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Qi Xue(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Jianming Ying(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Shuhang Wang(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Xiuli Tao(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Jun Zhao(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Yousheng Mao(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Bing Wang(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Kang Shao(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Wendong Lei(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Dali Wang(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Fang Lv(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Liang Zhao(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Fan Zhang(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Ziran Zhao(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Kai Su(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Fengwei Tan(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Yibo Gao(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Nan Sun(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Dawei Wu(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Yue Yu(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Yun Ling(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Zhijie Wang(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Chunjian Duan(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Wei Tang(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Lei Zhang(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Shun He(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Ning Wu(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Jie Wang(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Jie He(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College)
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
February 6, 2020
Cited by 411Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitors have shown efficacy in first-line treatment of NSCLC; however, evidence of PD-1 inhibitor as neoadjuvant treatment is limited. This is a phase 1b study to evaluate the safety and outcome of PD-1 inhibitor in neoadjuvant setting. METHODS: Treatment-naive patients with resectable NSCLC (stage IA-IIIB) received two cycles of sintilimab (200 mg, intravenously, day 1 out of 22). Operation was performed between day 29 and 43. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans were obtained at baseline and before the operation. The primary end point was safety. Efficacy end points included rate of major pathologic response (MPR) and objective response rate. Expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 was also evaluated (registration number: ChiCTR-OIC-17013726). RESULTS: A total of 40 patients enrolled, all of whom received two doses of sintilimab and 37 underwent radical resection. A total of 21 patients (52.5%) experienced neoadjuvant treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Four patients (10.0%) experienced grade 3 or higher neoadjuvant TRAEs, and one patient had grade 5 TRAE. Eight patients achieved radiological partial response, resulting in an objective response rate of 20.0%. Among 37 patients, 15 (40.5%) achieved MPR, including six (16.2%) with a pathologic complete response in primary tumor and three (8.1%) in lymph nodes as well. Squamous cell NSCLC exhibited superior response compared with adenocarcinoma (MPR: 48.4% versus 0%). Decrease of maximum standardized uptake values after sintilimab treatment correlated with pathologic remission (p < 0.00001). Baseline programmed cell death ligand 1 expression of stromal cells instead of tumor cells was correlated with pathologic regression (p = 0.0471). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant sintilimab was tolerable for patients with NSCLC, and 40.5% MPR rate is encouraging. The decrease of maximum standardized uptake values after sintilimab might predict pathologic response.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis