Clinical exome sequencing as the first-tier test for diagnosing developmental disorders covering both CNV and SNV: a Chinese cohort

Xinran Dong(Children's Hospital of Fudan University), Bo Liu(Children's Hospital of Fudan University), Lin Yang(Children's Hospital of Fudan University), Huijun Wang(Children's Hospital of Fudan University), Bingbing Wu(Children's Hospital of Fudan University), Renchao Liu(Children's Hospital of Fudan University), Hongbo Chen(Children's Hospital of Fudan University), Xiang Chen(Children's Hospital of Fudan University), Sha Yu(Children's Hospital of Fudan University), Bin Chen(Children's Hospital of Fudan University), Sujuan Wang(Children's Hospital of Fudan University), Xiu Xu(Children's Hospital of Fudan University), Wenhao Zhou(Children's Hospital of Fudan University), Yulan Lu(Children's Hospital of Fudan University)
Journal of Medical Genetics
January 31, 2020
Cited by 117Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Background Developmental disorders (DDs) are early onset disorders affecting 5%–10% of children worldwide. Chromosomal microarray analysis detecting CNVs is currently recommended as the first-tier test for DD diagnosis. However, this analysis omits a high percentage of disease-causing single nucleotide variations (SNVs) that warrant further sequencing. Currently, next-generation sequencing can be used in clinical scenarios detecting CNVs, and the use of exome sequencing in the DD cohort ahead of the microarray test has not been evaluated. Methods Clinical exome sequencing (CES) was performed on 1090 unrelated Chinese DD patients who were classified into five phenotype subgroups. CNVs and SNVs were both detected and analysed based on sequencing data. Results An overall diagnostic rate of 41.38% was achieved with the combinational analysis of CNV and SNV. Over 12.02% of patients were diagnosed based on CNV, which was comparable with the published CMA diagnostic rate, while 0.74% were traditionally elusive cases who had dual diagnosis or apparently homozygous mutations that were clarified. The diagnostic rates among subgroups ranged from 21.82% to 50.32%. The top three recurrent cytobands with diagnostic CNVs were 15q11.2-q13.1, 22q11.21 and 7q11.23. The top three genes with diagnostic SNVs were: MECP2 , SCN1A and SCN2A . Both the diagnostic rate and spectrums of CNVs and SNVs showed differences among the phenotype subgroups. Conclusion With a higher diagnostic rate, more comprehensive observation of variations and lower cost compared with conventional strategies, simultaneous analysis of CNVs and SNVs based on CES showed potential as a new first-tier choice to diagnose DD.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis