Going upstream – an umbrella review of the macroeconomic determinants of health and health inequalities

Yannish Naik(University of Liverpool), Peter Baker(Imperial College London), Sharif Ismail(Public Health England), Taavi Tillmann(University College London), Kristin Bash(University of Sheffield), Darryl Quantz(Health Education North West), Frances Hillier-Brown(Durham University), Wikum Jayatunga(University College London), Gill Kelly(Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust), Michelle Black(University of Sheffield), Anya Göpfert, Peter Roderick(Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust), Ben Barr(University of Liverpool), Clare Bambra(Royal Victoria Infirmary)
BMC Public Health
December 17, 2019
Cited by 138Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The social determinants of health have been widely recognised yet there remains a lack of clarity regarding what constitute the macro-economic determinants of health and what can be done to address them. An umbrella review of systematic reviews was conducted to identify the evidence for the health and health inequalities impact of population level macroeconomic factors, strategies, policies and interventions. METHODS: Nine databases were searched for systematic reviews meeting the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) criteria using a novel conceptual framework. Studies were assessed for quality using a standardised instrument and a narrative overview of the findings is presented. RESULTS: The review found a large (n = 62) but low quality systematic review-level evidence base. The results indicated that action to promote employment and improve working conditions can help improve health and reduce gender-based health inequalities. Evidence suggests that market regulation of tobacco, alcohol and food is likely to be effective at improving health and reducing inequalities in health including strong taxation, or restriction of advertising and availability. Privatisation of utilities and alcohol sectors, income inequality, and economic crises are likely to increase health inequalities. Left of centre governments and welfare state generosity may have a positive health impact, but evidence on specific welfare interventions is mixed. Trade and trade policies were found to have a mixed effect. There were no systematic reviews of the health impact of monetary policy or of large economic institutions such as central banks and regulatory organisations. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide a simple yet comprehensive framework to support policy-makers and practitioners in addressing the macroeconomic determinants of health. Further research is needed in low and middle income countries and further reviews are needed to summarise evidence in key gaps identified by this review. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Protocol for umbrella review prospectively registered with PROSPERO CRD42017068357.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis