Comparison of minimally invasive surgery with laparotomic approach in the treatment of high risk endometrial cancer: A systematic review
Giuseppe Scaletta(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Francesco Fanfani(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Vito Andrea Capozzi(University of Parma), Silvia Pelligra(Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), Giorgia Dinoi(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Anna Fagotti(Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), Raffaella Ergasti(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Stefano Cianci(Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), Giovanni Scambia(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic)
Cited by 56
Related Papers
Maintenance Olaparib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer
|New England Journal of Medicine|2018|2.9k
Olaparib tablets as maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer and a BRCA1/2 mutation (SOLO2/ENGOT-Ov21): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
|The Lancet Oncology|2017|1.9k
Olaparib tablets as maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer and a BRCA1/2 mutation (SOLO2/ENGOT-Ov21): a final analysis of a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
|The Lancet Oncology|2021|412
Outcome of Cesarean scar pregnancy managed expectantly: systematic review and meta‐analysis
|Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology|2017|299
SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer
|International Journal of Gynecological Cancer|2020|298