Revision and Update of the Consensus Definitions of Invasive Fungal Disease From the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium

J. Peter Donnelly(Radboud University Nijmegen), Sharon Chen(The University of Sydney), Carol A. Kauffman(University of Michigan), William J. Steinbach(Duke Medical Center), John W. Baddley(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Paul E. Verweij(Radboud University Nijmegen), Cornelius J. Clancy(University of Pittsburgh), John R. Wingard(University of Florida), Shawn R. Lockhart(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Andreas H. Groll(University Hospital Münster), Tania C. Sorrell(The University of Sydney), Matteo Bassetti(University of Udine), Hamdi Akan(Ankara University), Barbara D. Alexander(Duke Medical Center), David R. Andes(University of Wisconsin–Madison), Élie Azoulay(Délégation Paris 7), Ralf Bialek, Robert W. Bradsher(University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences), Stéphane Bretagne(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Thierry Calandra(University of Lausanne), Angela M. Caliendo(Brown University), Elio Castagnola(Istituto Giannina Gaslini), Mario Cruciani, Manuel Cuenca‐Estrella(Instituto de Salud Carlos III), Catherine F. Decker(Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences), Sujal R. Desai(Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust), Brian T. Fisher(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Thomas S. Harrison(St George's, University of London), Claus Peter Heußel(Heidelberg University), Henrik Elvang Jensen(University of Copenhagen), Christopher C. Kibbler(University College London), Dimitrios P. Kontoyiannis(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Bart Jan Kullberg(Radboud University Nijmegen), Katrien Lagrou(KU Leuven), Frédéric Lamoth(University of Lausanne), Thomas Lehrnbecher(Goethe University Frankfurt), Jürgen Loeffler(Universitätsklinikum Würzburg), Olivier Lortholary(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Johan Maertens(KU Leuven), Oscar Marchetti(University of Lausanne), Kieren A. Marr(Johns Hopkins University), Henry Masur(National Institutes of Health Clinical Center), Jacques F. Meis(Radboud University Nijmegen), C Orla Morrisey(Alfred Health), Márcio Nucci(Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro), Luis Ostrosky‐Zeichner, Livio Pagano(Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), Thomas F. Patterson(South Texas Veterans Health Care System), John R. Perfect(Duke Medical Center), Zdeněk Ráčil(Masaryk University), Emmanuel Roilides(Hippocration General Hospital), Marcus Ruhnke(Lukaskrankenhaus), Cornelia Schaefer Prokop(Radboud University Nijmegen), Shmuel Shoham(Johns Hopkins University), Monica A. Slavin(The University of Melbourne), David A. Stevens(California Institute for Medical Research), George R. Thompson(University of California Davis Medical Center), José A. Vázquez(Augusta University), Claudio Viscoli(Ospedale Policlinico San Martino), Thomas J. Walsh(Cornell University), Adilia Warris(University of Aberdeen), L. Joseph Wheat, P. Lewis White(University Hospital of Wales), Theoklis E. Zaoutis(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Peter G. Pappas(University of Alabama at Birmingham)
Clinical Infectious Diseases
October 8, 2019
Cited by 2,772Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) remain important causes of morbidity and mortality. The consensus definitions of the Infectious Diseases Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group have been of immense value to researchers who conduct clinical trials of antifungals, assess diagnostic tests, and undertake epidemiologic studies. However, their utility has not extended beyond patients with cancer or recipients of stem cell or solid organ transplants. With newer diagnostic techniques available, it was clear that an update of these definitions was essential. METHODS: To achieve this, 10 working groups looked closely at imaging, laboratory diagnosis, and special populations at risk of IFD. A final version of the manuscript was agreed upon after the groups' findings were presented at a scientific symposium and after a 3-month period for public comment. There were several rounds of discussion before a final version of the manuscript was approved. RESULTS: There is no change in the classifications of "proven," "probable," and "possible" IFD, although the definition of "probable" has been expanded and the scope of the category "possible" has been diminished. The category of proven IFD can apply to any patient, regardless of whether the patient is immunocompromised. The probable and possible categories are proposed for immunocompromised patients only, except for endemic mycoses. CONCLUSIONS: These updated definitions of IFDs should prove applicable in clinical, diagnostic, and epidemiologic research of a broader range of patients at high-risk.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis