FLASH Irradiation Spares Lung Progenitor Cells and Limits the Incidence of Radio-induced Senescence

Charles Fouillade(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Sandra Curras-Alonso(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Lorena Giuranno(Maastricht University), Eddy Quelennec(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Sophie Heinrich(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Sarah Bonnet-Boissinot(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Arnaud Beddok(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Sophie Leboucher(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Hamza Umut Karakurt(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Mylène Bohec(Institut Curie), Sylvain Baulande(Institut Curie), Marc Vooijs(Maastricht University), Pierre Verrelle(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Marie Dutreix(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Arturo Londoño‐Vallejo(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Vincent Favaudon(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
Clinical Cancer Research
December 3, 2019
Cited by 286Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: One of the main limitations to anticancer radiotherapy lies in irreversible damage to healthy tissues located within the radiation field. “FLASH” irradiation at very high dose-rate is a new treatment modality that has been reported to specifically spare normal tissue from late radiation-induced toxicity in animal models and therefore could be a promising strategy to reduce treatment toxicity. Experimental Design: Lung responses to FLASH irradiation were investigated by qPCR, single-cell RNA sequencing (sc-RNA-Seq), and histologic methods during the acute wound healing phase as well as at late stages using C57BL/6J wild-type and Terc−/− mice exposed to bilateral thorax irradiation as well as human lung cells grown in vitro. Results: In vitro studies gave evidence of a reduced level of DNA damage and induced lethality at the advantage of FLASH. In mouse lung, sc-RNA-seq and the monitoring of proliferating cells revealed that FLASH minimized the induction of proinflammatory genes and reduced the proliferation of progenitor cells after injury. At late stages, FLASH-irradiated lungs presented less persistent DNA damage and senescent cells than after CONV exposure, suggesting a higher potential for lung regeneration with FLASH. Consistent with this hypothesis, the beneficial effect of FLASH was lost in Terc−/− mice harboring critically short telomeres and lack of telomerase activity. Conclusions: The results suggest that, compared with conventional radiotherapy, FLASH minimizes DNA damage in normal cells, spares lung progenitor cells from excessive damage, and reduces the risk of replicative senescence.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis