Molecular Evolution of <i>IDH</i> Wild-Type Glioblastomas Treated With Standard of Care Affects Survival and Design of Precision Medicine Trials: A Report From the EORTC 1542 Study

Kaspar Draaisma(University of Liège), Aikaterini Chatzipli(Wellcome Sanger Institute), Martin Taphoorn(Medisch Centrum Haaglanden), Melissa Kerkhof(Medisch Centrum Haaglanden), Astrid Weyerbrock(University Medical Center Freiburg), Marc Sanson(Sorbonne Université), Ann Hoeben(Maastricht University), Slávka Lukacova(Aarhus University Hospital), Giuseppe Lombardi(Istituto Oncologico Veneto), Sieger Leenstra(Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis), Monique C.J. Hanse(Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis), Ruth Fleischeuer(Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis), Colin Watts(University of Birmingham), Joseph H. McAbee(National Cancer Institute), Nicos Angelopoulos(Wellcome Sanger Institute), Thierry Gorlia(European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer), Vassilis Golfinopoulos(European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer), Johan M. Kros(Erasmus MC), Roel G.W. Verhaak(Jackson Laboratory), Vincent Bours(University of Liège), Martin J. van den Bent(Erasmus MC), Ultan McDermott(Wellcome Sanger Institute), Pierre A. Robe(University of Liège), Pim J. French(Erasmus MC)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
November 21, 2019
Cited by 118

Abstract

PURPOSE Precision medicine trials in glioblastoma (GBM) are often conducted at tumor recurrence. However, second surgeries for recurrent GBM are not routinely performed, and therefore, molecular data for trial inclusion are predominantly derived from the primary sample. This study aims to establish whether molecular targets change during tumor progression and, if so, whether this affects precision medicine trial design. MATERIALS AND METHODS We collected 186 pairs of primary-recurrent GBM samples from patients receiving chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide and sequenced approximately 300 cancer genes. MGMT, TERT, and EGFRvIII status was individually determined. RESULTS The molecular profile of our cohort was identical to that of other GBM cohorts ( IDH wild-type [WT], 95%; EGFR amplified, approximately 50%), indicating that patients amenable to second surgery do not represent a specific molecular subtype. Molecular events in IDH WT GBMs were stable in approximately 80% of events, but changes in mutation status were observed for all examined genes (range, approximately 90% and 60% for TERT and EGFR mutations, respectively), and such changes strongly affected targeted trial size and design. A similar pattern of GBM driver instability was observed within MGMT promoter–methylated tumors. MGMT promoter methylation status remained prognostic at tumor recurrence. The observation that hypermutation at GBM recurrence was rare (8%) and not correlated with outcome was relevant for immunotherapy-based treatments. CONCLUSION This large cohort of matched primary and recurrent IDH WT tumors establishes the frequency of GBM driver instability after chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide. This allows per gene or pathway calculation of trial size at tumor recurrence, using molecular data of the primary tumor only. We also identify genes for which repeat surgery is necessary because of low mutation retention rate.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis