Pembrolizumab As Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in KEYNOTE-240: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial

Richard S. Finn(University of California, Los Angeles), Baek‐Yeol Ryoo(Ulsan College), Philippe Merle, Masatoshi Kudo(Kindai University), Mohamed Bouattour(Hôpital Beaujon), Ho Yeong Lim(Samsung Medical Center), В. В. Бредер(Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation), Julien Edeline(Centre Eugène Marquis), Yee Chao(Taipei Veterans General Hospital), Sadahisa Ogasawara(Chiba University), Thomas Yau, Marcelo Garrido(Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile), Stephen L. Chan(Chinese University of Hong Kong), Jennifer J. Knox(University of Toronto), Bruno Daniele, Scot Ebbinghaus(Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States)), Erluo Chen(Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States)), Abby B. Siegel(Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States)), Andrew X. Zhu(Harvard University), Ann‐Lii Cheng(National Taiwan University Hospital), on behalf of the KEYNOTE-240 investigators
Journal of Clinical Oncology
December 2, 2019
Cited by 1,806

Abstract

PURPOSE Pembrolizumab demonstrated antitumor activity and safety in the phase II KEYNOTE-224 trial in previously treated patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). KEYNOTE-240 evaluated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS This randomized, double-blind, phase III study was conducted at 119 medical centers in 27 countries. Eligible patients with advanced HCC, previously treated with sorafenib, were randomly assigned at a two-to-one ratio to receive pembrolizumab plus best supportive care (BSC) or placebo plus BSC. Primary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS; one-sided significance thresholds, P = .0174 [final analysis] and P = .002 [first interim analysis], respectively). Safety was assessed in all patients who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug. RESULTS Between May 31, 2016, and November 23, 2017, 413 patients were randomly assigned. As of January 2, 2019, median follow-up was 13.8 months for pembrolizumab and 10.6 months for placebo. Median OS was 13.9 months (95% CI, 11.6 to 16.0 months) for pembrolizumab versus 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.3 to 13.5 months) for placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.781; 95% CI, 0.611 to 0.998; P = .0238). Median PFS for pembrolizumab was 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 4.1 months) versus 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.5 to 4.1 months) for placebo at the first interim analysis (HR, 0.775; 95% CI, 0.609 to 0.987; P = .0186) and 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 4.1 months) versus 2.8 months (95% CI, 1.6 to 3.0 months) at final analysis (HR, 0.718; 95% CI, 0.570 to 0.904; P = .0022). Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 147 (52.7%) and 62 patients (46.3%) for pembrolizumab versus placebo; those that were treatment related occurred in 52 (18.6%) and 10 patients (7.5%), respectively. No hepatitis C or B flares were identified. CONCLUSION In this study, OS and PFS did not reach statistical significance per specified criteria. The results are consistent with those of KEYNOTE-224, supporting a favorable risk-to-benefit ratio for pembrolizumab in this population.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis